It sounds way better to investors than, we are in a dying business guys!

That was the usual experience pre AI

No you cannot

They described the use of abstract data types. One can certainly use those in most languages - for sure in C.

> runST :: (forall s. ST s a) -> a

> The rank-2 type (that is, the type s is scoped within the parenthesis and can't escape) of runST ensures that the mutable references created inside the computation cannot escape due to being tagged with the type s. Internally, all sorts of imperative nonsense may occur. Externally, the function is pure. The world outside the boundary gets none of the mutation, only the result.

C does not have parametric polymorphism, nor rank-2 quantifications, so no, this cannot be done in C.

This was not the original claim in the thread I responded to which as "even with a dynamically typed language, you can keep escaped strings as an Escaped class, with escape(str)->Escaped and dangerouslyAssumeEscaped(str)->Escaped functions (or static methods)." so this was about abstract data types and not polymorphism.

Regardless, you can also have some limited parametric polymorphism in C with macros. This is very poor, but parametric polymorphism in Rust is based on monomorphization so it is also quite poor. You can also have higher-order polymorphism in C but then you need to use subtype polymorphism.

Call it a K-loop please. Where ai in a k-loop builds a portfolio

Epstein class

They overhired, made a mess with people who are not very passionate. Then they fired but they fired all kinds, including some very good ones. Then they are still stuck in that loop and thinking AI is a solution to that

Apparently the cost/price is 20x in the major providers. Not clear how it is a business

Just nationalist with focus on community?

OOM is log10

Should be at least 4X the RAM and 4X CPU cores, just to run Windows at a comparable speed.