So by your logic, if I order a human driven taxi, and the driver does something illegal, I should be arrested along with him? Obviously assumming I didn't threaten and/or bribe him to do that illegal action.
Well, maybe the reason why those men didn't want to complete college is because they don't have the same support that women do (or at least, that's what they percieve).
Another strong reason is that the work they're willing to take doesn't require a college deplomia. (On top of that a university degree not demonstrating the value to the struggle it took to get it)
In part, lack of support (other than financial) is a reason it took me so long to complete college. But anecdata can't be relied on for population studies. These questions need to be asked, sure.
Based on the chart in the St. Louis Fed link, in the US women have outnumbered men since 1980 (shortly after the Vietnam draft ended). While the ratio has been increasing the only real visually noticeable upticks in the data were around 1993 for 4+ year colleges and 2001 for 2-year colleges. I wonder if some men who might have gone to a 2-year school instead enlisted following 9/11.
I don't think there was any particular STEM support for women in 1980 and into the early 1990s, at least. But maybe something did happen in 1993 (and possibly something additional to 9/11 in 2001). Are these additional women going into STEM majors?
If the meta-RCT shows that RCTs are efficacious, then RCT's are effective. But, if the meta-RCT shows that RCTs are not efficacious, that means the meta-RCT, which is also an RCT, cannot be trusted, which means that RCTs are still effective.
However they do have the power to end a boycott, either directly or indirectly (see the laws passed by various states regarding refusing to do business with Israel).
Just in a quick glance at the source it seems like simply poor or misleading phrasing on wikipedia. Looks like the poll wasn't "support/oppose" with 95% oppose but it was more like "do you support" with 5% yes.
However, it does not apply in this case because the U.S. does not recognize Palestine as a country, and if that changes, it seems unlikely that it would be a country friendly to the United States.
> When my girlfriend texts me when I'm out with my AirPods, I think we'd both like me to hear her message in her actual voice rather than Siri's
And then you can use voice to text to text her back, and she can hear it in your voice! It's just like a phone call from 30 years ago, but one that requires infinitely more processing power!
Genuinely funny reply. But (a) whether I prefer typing or speaking, and (b) whether I prefer reading or hearing, is very context-dependent and might not be the same for the person at the other end -- and so yeah I think having flexibility there is good! If I'm on AirPods and not on my phone, I'd like to hear the message. CarPlay, too. When actively on my phone, I prefer to type, even if on AirPods. CarPlay, I shouldn't probably be typing ever. So yeah, generating text and speech simultaneously and having the end result be situational is in fact a good thing.
It's worth noting this is already how iPhones work and people already love it. What I'm suggesting additionally is substituting Siri's voice for a DIFFERENT customized synthetic voice in a very specific circumstance. I'm not advocating for using synthetic voices where there currently aren't any here.
> It's just like a phone call from 30 years ago, but one that requires infinitely more processing power
There are folks who couldn’t, for a variety of reasons, do that thirty years ago. This feature is for them. The rest of us get to e.g. more naturally text a response to a call we’re listening into on a flight.
> Can't you already do that with iMessage's voice delivery feature?
Voice memos? No. I would have to, at some point, speak it. If you’re referring to text-to-speech, there is a difference between having your speech read in a different voice and your own.
On the plus side it would use less bandwidth. That phone call from 30 years ago probably used (ballpark) 64kilobits/second. This could use a lot less and have higher audio quality.
