I wonder if people are wrongly just going to start calling random, completely-unrelated-to-LLM bugs in software "hallucination". Very similar to the meaning of AI changing in recent years to include basically any software that has some type of algorithm or heuristic built into it.
You are the horse. Platforms realized they don't have to keep making faster horses or cars or whatnot if they just turn their users into zombie-like creatures who mindlessly click on what's presented to them albeit just to chase that next carrot of dopamine.
Pretty sure he's following the rules and besides what business do you have imposing on this thread when you have nothing to contribute in terms of the conversation?
To say biggest "private equities" in the world own large portions of each other is absolutely correct. It's nitpicking to resort to technicalities of what arm of Blackrock owns what arm of Vanguard, not at all the point and it only distracts from the main point about conflicts of interest when it comes to the control of publicly traded media, NBC, CNN, newscorp (almost all media that matters) and thus suppression of free speech.
Thank you. I get a lot of this litigious attitude on Hacker News but the bad actors are either wrong or trying to instigate irrational arguments. Like someone will post something political, I’ll point out an inconsistency in their argument, so they accuse me of starting a flame war and downvote me into oblivion. There’s more opinion making, control of narrative, and group-think on this site these days. It’s weird.
Feels more useful for something like cli where you want to run one-off commands to test something instead of running it in production given how non-deterministic the behavior can be for example for something like
chat.ask "What's being said?", with: { audio: "meeting.wav" }
definitely don't want users to get a valid response only 75% of the times, maybe?
or just maybe, and i know its a crazy idea, a certain individual is objectively an awful person who has done great harm in the world and its subjective if its greater or lesser then the good (imho its far greater harms then any good done but i know that is my subjective view)
just because you disagree with a widespread view/opinion does not mean its bots
