didn’t cv raman prove just that via his raman-effect for which he got the noble prize ?

Kind of, but not really.

Rayleigh scattering is elastic (only the direction changes), whereas Raman scattering is inelastic (energy, that is color changes in addition to direction) scattering.

a quick kagi search revealed this: https://briancallahan.net/blog/20250222.html, perhaps it might work for you too ?

This compares VMWare Fusion to Virtual Buddy

i will go for ‘aint gonna happen for a 1000 dollars alex’

is that actually surprising ?

once data leaves the fs and is all (or in part) bought into a processes memory, access is just limited by the memory bandwidth.

ofcourse if you start touching uncached data things slow down, but just for a short while…

the title is bit misleading, and all the article sez is to

```

    To find out more about why 2025 failed to become the Year of the AI Agent, I recommend reading  my full New Yorker piece .

```

so essentially, just go and read the new-yorker piece here: https://archive.ph/VQ1fT

> There’s often the question of communication overhead between people; Claude would remove that.

... and replace that with communication overhead with claude ?

If you’re already communicating with Claude, it’s not additional overhead.

Not really. Erlang's VM is actually surprisingly slow, and in the era of c10k it was still using select/poll, which were getting to be bottlenecks.

What Erlang excels at is "no programming mistake ever should the whole system permanently down". As in components will reboot to recover. It's not a magic fix for anything outside of that.

this was vibe-coded and then human improved.

references to faster version of it are already provided.

well, i haven't found better introduction to calculus than the 'calculus made easy' book by mr. silvanus-p-thompson.

have been gifting the hardcopy of that book to all my friend's kids who are interested in these kinds of things.

highly recommended.

dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46344548

anachronism: