I love https://starlight.astro.build

none of these are required, aside from the work example.

You just find a phone useful

Required would be “I can’t participate in society without a phone”, eg not being able to get healthcare or pay for things w/o a phone

Liquid Glass is fine now. I mean I don’t like it but I’m used to it.

It was very very bad during the beta though

I totally agree provided Frank lives in some maximum-security apartment complex with armed guards. Otherwise I think you'd making a big deal out of nothing.

Anyone can get into a complex by following someone else in.

Or, in this case, just power the solenoid wire that is _already outside_ as the OP did.

You can do this via a Docker container or seatbelt on MacOS.

in both cases you'd limit it so CC can only talk to the required Anthropic APIs.

So not zero access, but as close to it as you can get.

but... they could add the LLM to the app

Let's take Zawinski's old law up a notch:

"Every program attempts to expand until it has a built in LLM."

I'd leave the US if the tech jobs didn't pay so much better here.

I mostly like the US but the years since Obama have been rough

Pay may be numerically less in the eu, but rather than me trying to convince you, try on youtube: 'why I left the USA for europe'. There are very many.!

I've seen a lot of those and commonly the people are academics or in near median paying professions. Do high paid techies make the usa->Europe switch? Generally most of the grievances people have with the US disappear with a high enough salary. Like getting guarantees many weeks of vacation and having great healthcare.

That's good to know! Those would be good to look at if one wanted to know why some people move to the US.

Now let's look at how each of them is trending over time.

TBH I am a little more concerned about people dying from the conflict than paying a bit more for gas

What about the people who will die because they cannot afford the higher prices that will come from a disruption in gas supply?

You could've written that comment in a more constructive way.

As you probably already know, my point was that it's a bit callous to focus on "this war is expensive and inconvenient" while innocent people are, you know, dying.

I was really into Deno until it went all-in on nodejs compatibility (like Bun).

At that point I was left wondering -- if Bun and Deno have essentially the same strategy/approach, why would I pick the less mature option?

And so I ported everything to Bun

Because Bun's runtime is a bug ridden mess. Say what you want about Deno but people that chose Bun's runtime over Deno's are either not really using Bun's runtime (just the package manager part) or are not running in production at scale.

Yeah I’m not running it at scale. It’s been good for my projects though

I've felt this recently. I've often been bad about scope creep. CC makes it so easy.

On the other hand, I can see these tools getting good enough that scope creep doesn't even matter.

ATM I usually get stuck around the review/verification stage. As in, my code works, I have tested that it works, but it is failing CI or someone left a PR comment. And for each comment I'll have to make sure it makes sense, make the change, test again, and get CI passing again.