as things are ready to be shown you will see them : this is how you will know

truly removing the `id` from video.

Yeah that code example is odd to say the least.

> https://github.com/f4b6a3

> f4b6a3: a meaningless random package name

...well, I guess that's one way to name your library!

Definitely flagged. There is no way a human would think this was worthy of writing let alone sharing.

But I assume humans thought it was worthy of an upvote? Unless that's also compromised by AI?

This is great! As someone outgrowing Duolingo this is perfect. I do agree it would be nice to be able to switch between dialects.

The Society of the Spectacle: redux.

Not to gatekeep hn but.. wtf? Can we get a deluge of erlang posts or something? Maybe a prolog avalanche? Perhaps a plethora of Alan Kay interviews?

yep: https://www.cell-lang.net/faq.html

I am assuming they want to add an offline mode?

For most SaaS apps even offline is going to sync with the central service and not with other peers.

Direct peer-to-peer without a intermediating server is so rare for SaaS that I don't even know of an example.

Even with a star topology, how do you go about preserving user intent for text insertions without CRDTs and without rewriting (transforming) mutations so that client and server result in same state (basically OT)?

When inserting text, you can either use mutations that insert the text relative to some reference character(s) or at some index. The former is basically the approach of most text CRDTs. I'm having a hard time imagining the latter without modifying the insertion index relative to concurrent insertions or deletions. I believe that Jupiter based OT imposes a global order, but uses it to determine how concurrent mutations are transformed against one another.