Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sdf4j's commentslogin

Curious about why the janky manual paper processes, excel sheets, or stuff not documented, was fixed only when vibe code was available. Was it just cost?


Time and thus cost. Early in my career I would look across a fairly large company at processes being ran on spreadsheets and see if it would be worth the time to create software to address and if those processes should be standardized. We barely scratched the surface with all the possible custom software opportunities for this company.


Cost and managerial overhead. We don't have a dev on staff. Even if we did, there is lots of managerial overhead to explain "the problem" and then iterate to a solution with a dev. Now you can just build the damn solution yourself!


> they all have the same mother, grew up in the same house, etc.

I’m pretty sure the first one didn’t have siblings, and the second only had one. Also their mother is not the same person after raising the first kid, or raising two.

Parenting never have reproducible conditions.


I have twins (a boy and a girl) and you could tell they have a completely different temperament about two weeks after birth.


I’m a twin - admittedly boy/girl, so already with some fundamental differences - and we are very, very different people. Always have been. Different interests, different ways of seeing the world, different attitudes to competition, sports, social relationships etc.

Now I’ve got 2 boys, and even at fairly young ages they were very different. I’d say by 6 months old the basics of their personalities were visible, and they haven’t changed vastly as they’ve grown.


The twins I have known are the same. I would assume it has something to do with a desire to differentiate themselves from one another, but they always seemed far more dissimilar in personality and affect than my siblings.


OTOH could be siblings tend to be more similar as the smaller ones try to copy the older ones (my son would dress up as a ballerina to play with his sister when he was little, my smaller brother would acquiesce to play chess with me just to spend time together etc).

I have given up trying to explain child development, there's just too many variables.


An adjacent point but despite ubiquitous birth order superstitions quality literature consensus seems to be that birth order is not a large driver of predictable differences. Example:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4655556/


Agree, those are some environmental differences. But any "microRNA" profile I might have contributed to the conception of each would be broadly similar. My life was pretty stable and levels of stress, diet, exercise, etc. were all about the same for all three.


There are even identical twins that have different behaviors, characters and make different decisions.


I agree with what you are saying but remember the twin scenario. Spoiler alert, the kids are nonetheless different.



Good thing is that we can start using Insomnium now.


It is unmaintained.

This is the cost of devs focusing on corporate gains and not their craft.


Why you and other devs say Insomnia is unmaintained?

There has been a release in september, issues has been solved within last month, and multiple pull requests has been managed (merged and rejected) also recently.

Maybe you refer to issues specific to a platform? Thanks in advance.


Insomnium


Devs have to eat and if someone offers you a life altering amount of money to work on their hobby project, a lot of them would probably take it. It's hard to turn down something that might assure your family a comfortable life.


That's all good, and I hope they're happy, but they shouldn't expect their audience to stick around if they start to ruin the project that got them there.


Sure, but why does it always have to lead to users getting the short end of the stick? Why can't they accept money and NOT screw over the users? And if the choice is between "Take VC money and screw users" and "Reject VC money and happy users", why do 99% of the people take the first option? They're most likely software developers (as this is the context), so it isn't really a choice between "uncomfortable life" or "comfortable life", there is something more going on here.


This is not what I said. I meant that users should contribute and not expect FOSS projects as a separate channel of getting material for their corporate work.


I want to judge the devs for it but if a VC walked up to me with a bag full of cash and the opportunity to work full time on a passion project I can’t be anywhere near sure I’d say no.


That bag full of cash will keep being a bag full of cash but the passion project will likely become driven by whoever hands you the bag and will head towards their goals, not yours. Anyway you'll keep the cash. It's not different from what the vast majority of us do with our jobs every day.


Do you apply the same logic to your plumber? Your accountant? The 'craft' is something you do for customers in order to make money to eat.


The plumber doesn't start to install additional pipes that require an annual fee, or spying on me "because you know, nothing to hide", or any other nonsense we are seeing in software.


Which is why plumbers don't get VC money and salaries aren't as high.


That’s the point, with wifi you already have the array of microphones in the room.


When I see suggestions to "own" your email domain, how do you manage the chicken-egg problem of needing an email address in the first place to register the domain you want to lease?

Are there registrars that let you walk in with a physical ID to proof you are you in case your email gets compromised and they get access to the registrar? Any experience with that?


what you mean we can't? there are a lot of curated content directories out there.


Right, I suppose I mean "getting more people to think about why a few of these bookmarked for your favorite topics, especially tied to a trustworthy person, is a million times better than just hitting up Google."

Or, perhaps, a "a better Google should just take you to these."

Something like that.


GitLab is a completely different platform.

This comes to solve the problem of the terrible UX in the most widespread git service. I won't dare to try to convince my whole team, or company, to migrate to GitLab, but this can be easily adopted.


not having a way to divide notification channels, transactional vs promotional, make it worse than android.


Explicitly promotional push isn't allowed on iPhone to begin with. Only exception is if the user enables it via some setting inside your app, separate from the regular permission dialog, which is really unlikely.

Of course you can just pass off promotional stuff as not promotional, but same on Android, and you have to be sly about it.


>Only exception is if the user enables it via some setting inside your app

Or if Apple has a movie they really really want to promote


Haha true, or better yet a U2 album


> I always say to buy a domain first.

You can only rent a domain. The landlord is merciless if you miss a payment, you are out.

There are risks everywhere, and it depresses me how fragile is our online identity.


"You can only rent a domain."

If ICANN-approved root.zone and ICANN-approved registries are the only options.

As an experiment I created own registry, not shared with anyone. For many years I have run own root server, i.e., I serve own custom root.zone to all computers I own. I have a search experiment that uses a custom TLD that embeds a well-known classification system. The TLD portion of the domainname can catgorise any product or service on Earth.

ICANN TLDs are vague, ambiguous, sometimes even deceptive.


You should write something about this…


This sounds like a wonderful project, do you have any documentation of the process you wouldn't mind sharing? Would love to play around with something similar to what you did, almost like a mini-internet.


Is there any difference here from running a normal DNS server?

Any of your special domains will be ones your server claims as authoritative, so I don't understand why you need a root server?


"Is there any difference here from running a normal DNS server?"

Yes.


Do you also have a trusted TLS certificate authority? If yes, how has been your experience maintaining and securing it?


For this system, I have alternatives to "TLS" and to "trusted TLS certificate authorities".

None of this is connected to the internet. It is "home lab" stuff.

I have alternatives for so-called "modern" web browsers controlled by advertising companies, too.

For all the third-party-mediated stuff on today's internet I generally have alternatives that let me have more control.


> The landlord is merciless if you miss a payment, you are out.

That’s a skill issue though.

I have a domain that i used to pre-pay for years in advance.

For my current main domain i had prepaid nine years in advance and it was paid up to 2028. A couple of years ago i topped it up and now it’s prepaid up to 2032.

It’s not much money (when I prepaid for 9 years i spent like 60€ or so) and you’re usually saving because you’re fixing the price so skipping price hikes, inflation etc.


Host the wrong content, you are out, get sued because of someone elses trademark on your domain, you are out, registrar actually dissolved or has weird stuff? out.


True...but there are alternative approaches...such as maybe register a couple (not alot) of alternative, different domains. I think the trick is to keep the number of alternative domains low enough that it wont break the bank, but still give the option of serving as sort of backups. Then again, one would need to understand one's "threat" model before beginning to post content that might be "attacked" by others.


Which is why I included the third one - even if you don't piss off a sovereign no technology hosting company is forever.


> ...no technology hosting company is forever.

Yeah, good point!


It's something of a technical limitation though: there's no reason all my devices - the consumers of my domain name - couldn't just accept that anything signed with some key is actually XorNot.com or whatever...but good luck keeping that configuration together.

You very reasonably could replace the whole system with just "lists of trusted keys to names" if the concept has enough popular technical support.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: