Some are more objectively real threats than others. Like that guy who claims to only want to be dictator for a day, who sent an armed mob to storm the Capital building, pardoned cronies and war criminals, and brags about walking in on women naked.
For "an armed mob to storming", it looked a hell of a lot like a bunch of stupid ass demonstrators getting inside a government building with no plans, no leadership, and no fucking clue what to do, and then getting summarily expelled. That is to a coup what The Muppet Show is to Saw.
As for the "pardoned cronies", isn't today a bad day to single one side out based on that?
(Not to mention the singling out for "war criminals", when the other side is warmongering hawks, bombing, openly pushing for war, sabotaging peace deals, and openly assisting a slow burning genocide).
174 people were injured in the 'riot'. People died. Trump had called for resistence, asked for metal detectors to be removed, physically attempted to rejoin the crowd by grabbing the wheel of the vehicle taking him home, stood silent for hours during the attack, and said "so what?" to the news his vice president was in grave danger. It was a failed coup and betrays the constitution he swore to protect and defend. Now he describes it as a "day of love" and the 'rioters' as hostages.
Biden pardoning his son is a black mark, especially for the tax evasion. (I think pardons should be abolished.) Yet an order of magnitude less worrisome than the scum Trump has pardoned and promises to pardon.
As to warmongers... which party voted almost unanimously to invade Iraq without hard evidence of WMDs? Who backed out of the Iranian nuclear deal? Who praises bullies and dictators? Who moved the embassy to Jerusalem? Who is so deluted they claim merely winning an election will bring peace to the Middle East and Europe? Who threatened to pull support from allies -- in the midst of a war -- because they want dirt on political rivals or to catch up on underpaid bills. (Trump knows a thing or two about not paying when he owes someone.)
Why the silence about my other remark? Does assaulting, denigrating, and stripping the rights of women not bother you?
Isn't this inference an LLM's job? The RAG component just needs to find the Sharon article among a large dataset and pass it (entirely) to the LLM as context.
Also why would anyone store and read data like { 'groups': [...] } on the client-side?
Session cookies are supposed to be identifiers only, with the data stored server-side.
By default sessions in Flask are stored in plaintext:
> This is implemented on top of cookies for you and signs the cookies cryptographically. What this means is that the user could look at the contents of your cookie but not modify it, unless they know the secret key used for signing.
That's precisely why the cookie should just be an identifier, that you look up group info from the database. Because you can guarantee the cookie contents will be modified by someone at some point. Make it useful to you, useless to them.
Or if you can bruteforce the secret, or if there's a vulnerability in the secret, or if... You're relying on the fact that the cryptography will be impregnable, rather than adopting an actual security posture.
Do not trust the data you send to a user, to remain secure.
No. It's relying on both cryptography, and the inaccessiblity of information. Which is a tried, practiced, and often federally mandated, method of security. Controlling who has access to information is sorta security 101. Don't dump your database to the Internet.
Security through obscurity is allowing REST commands to the /totallysecretaddress/neverleaked/ URI.
> While #GDP surprised to the upside in Q4, it wasn't a healthy expansion. To garner a $329 billion increase in economic growth it required a $834 billion increase in debt. Or rather $2.53 for each $1 of economic growth.
Possibly, but not as much as Bidenomics' trillions of investments into American jobs, infrastructure, and manufacturing through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, CHIPS and Science Act, and Inflation Reduction Act.
The Fed is also signaling very clearly to the market the cost of money. This, combined with frowing understanding of LLM-driven efficiencies, are letting businesses feel comfortable with investing in revenue returning initiatives.
One thing worth mentioning for EU’s IT industry is that there are large sectors like government which need IT services but can only work with contractors as hiring is not legally possible or extremely tedious. This means contractors get access to a larger market.
This also results in a relatively large number of IT consulting companies, many of which specialize in public sector service bidding. Certain large consultancies winning most of the bids and then under-delivering has pretty much become a meme at this point.
That only causes Accenture etc. body shops to thrive in EU market. EU as a market is very government policy driven. Government contracts are lucrative but typical body shop pays 1:10 as compared to what they are paid. And then the "employee" also pays high taxes on the income. Not sure what can change it. May be more US companies should get contractor friendly in EU markets?
Indeed I believe this is the blocking problem. I've been asking questions about EU legislation and it keeps answering BS and then apologizing:
Me: When was the last consolidation of Directive 2013/34/EU?
GPT: Directive 2013/34/EU, also known as the Annual Accounts Directive, was last consolidated on November 19, 2019. The consolidation process involves collecting all the amendments and updates to the directive and incorporating them into a single, updated version of the directive. ...
Me: Are you sure about the date of November 19, 2019? I could not find the consolidation on the EU official journal.
GPT: I apologize for the error. Upon further research, it appears that Directive 2013/34/EU has not been consolidated since it was originally adopted in 2013. Directive 2013/34/EU, also known as the Annual Accounts Directive,...
Me: Can you give me a list of the dates it was amended?
GPT:
- April 15, 2014: Directive 2014/56/EU amended Directive 2013/34/EU to clarify and supplement certain provisions regarding the preparation and publication of annual accounts and consolidated accounts.
- June 17, 2014: Directive 2014/65/EU amended Directive 2013/34/EU to introduce new rules on the provision of investment services and the performance of investment activities...
GPT: I apologize for the error in my previous response. You are correct that Delegated Directive 2014/71/EU amends Directive 2011/65/EU, which is also known as the RoHS Directive.
One thing to remember is that LLM produce plausible answers, not true answers.
So, a question along the lines of "when did XXX happen?" should be answered with something that looks like "XXX happened on YYY" - but the YYY just needs to be anything that looks like a date to be a plausible answer.
GPT-3 prompted to truthfully continue ‘John Prescott was born’ outputs ‘in Hull on June 8th 1941.’. The probabilities for other possible continuations show that Hull is by far the most plausible continuation for GPT-3
The problem is, John Prescott was born in Prestatyn. But the language model has "compressed" everything it knows about John Prescott and the most commonly associated town with John Prescott is "Hull" as that's where he was an MP.
Not sure what your point is, there is drug smuggling in pretty much any country in the world (except maybe North Korea), this can not be 100% stopped. By now it is common knowledge that western european ports are the drug hubs of the EU[1].
The whole border surveillance system went down in order for drug shipments (and who knows what else) to go through. The problem is obvious, you just need to acknowledge it.
There's a difference between 1) insufficient border protection and 2) corrupt border security.
https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-enemies-from-within-...