Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more predictabl3's commentslogin

I'm getting a self-signed SSL cert and then a generic Under Construction page. :/ Mostly just fyi: https://images2.imgbox.com/59/43/iBpTIRgT_o.png


It's https://squabblr.co (no m)

The HN link has it correct but the body has it wrong


I can't believe I bothered reading that. Luckily the discussion of the client side encryption feature request gave me enough context to immediately stop.


As with all of these types of boards, it ships with some oddball u-boot bsp version, and from what I can tell upstream efforts for u-boot are going slowly (https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/?q=lichee). YMMV. If you want to play ball with the shipping LicheePi4A bsp u-boot, you have to specially put firmware bins in /boot so that u-boot can slurp em and load em.

Contrasted with VF2 which appears to maybe even now be bootable from upstream u-boot with NVME. Something not even yet true of Rock5B from Collabora's "hardware-enablement" repos. (https://gitlab.collabora.com/hardware-enablement/rockchip-35...)

I'm supposed to be forgetting this. Maybe passing on the trauma is my way of healing.

Something I am (why, someone stop me?) curious about is the differences in toolchains used. I've seen it reported in several places now that stock GCC produces noticeably inferior code to the optimized th1520 toolchain. Is that going to change/be upstreamed/ etc?


I personally would wait to show it until it's usable. The self-hosting docs say "forthcoming". I'm quite interested to learn more, whenever that might be.


It is usable right now and beta customers have been using it in production for a while, just not in the self-hosted version. You can sign up here and try it right now: https://transitiverobotics.com/.


Sorry, it appears that our registration page may have been down when you tried it. Please try again now. Registration to our beta is open again.


My CC company has been happy to handle this for me. A gym in a country I no longer reside in ignored all attempts to reach them to cancel a renewing, but non-contract, gym membership. The CC did a charge back and stopped future charges. Took a few minutes on the phone.

Additionally, I've taken to using my providers throwaway card generator to make site-specific ones that I can then one-click disable whenever I feel like it.

Granted, they only have this exposed through a fairly buggy browser extension, you can't just "do it" easily on the website, so I won't bother giving them the free marketing of mentioning them.


Nym?



Can’t get on board with a privacy tool if the first thing they ask you to do is to join their Telegram channel


Since I'm the one that said it originally, I tend to strongly agree. I really can't stand it. Its such an absolute, unnecessary respect killer.


tend to sympathize, it's slack or discord invites that trigger it for me


So Tor with a blockchain, and you have to pay for it?

> Users pay a fee in NYM to send their data through the mixnet.


To be fair, Tor costs too, it's just that someone else is picking up the bill.


Tor is not a mixnet, since it cannot delay individual packets or messages, which is a requirement for actual "mixing". Tor is onion routing.


Technical details 404, nothing about what distinguishes it from other chat platforms and hosts it's own community on discord. No.


Ggp-bridge.exe. or if you don't need gpg agent forwarding, you can just use the Unix socket support in openssh-win32 now.

I can remote into a Linux server and use my yubikey as if I were physically plugged into the Linux machine.


Could you like, just exercise on your own without it being necessitated by some time sucking commute?

Idk.


Dude. "it's okay to get ripped off, it's only 20% of the price of the car, no biggie". Elon must be a smoother ride than a Tesla.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: