Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pamcake's commentslogin

This kind of post really shouldn't require client-side js — from third-party domain — to read...

static markdown version: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ze3tar/ze3tar.github.io/9d...


big ups pimp


AMP wasn't part of Chrome.

The Prompt API is part of a real W3C standard: https://www.w3.org/2025/03/webmachinelearning-charter.html

It's not even chaired by Google. It's Intel, believe it or not.


I don't understand this choice at all. What do you base your trust on here?

> I'm announcing the release of the 6.12.86 kernel.

> All users of the 6.12 kernel series must upgrade.

https://lwn.net/Articles/1071571/



Wait, why isn't that the article instead? Who actually wants this fade-scroll-thing? It detracts from the sensible content.

even this "ascii" (i expected raw text but still got html+css) was hardly readable for me, had to reach to the reader view, finally readable, ohh... looks much like ai-generated, why did i spend so much time jumping over obstacles...

The length and rambling nature of it was a clear AI indicator.

This is unfortunately the problem with the Boring Internet. It's subject to the common denominator which is shite. And LLMs generate a lot of that.


CSS always counters the conceptual and philosophical use of hypertext.

Color contrast in the text version isn’t great either

Yeah, scroll fade might be useful sometimes but most of the time it's just annoying.

https://dbushell.com/2026/01/09/death-to-scroll-fade/


Fortunately my "defenses" worked on this one, though CSS only doesn't seem to have been enough. I don't care if they want to make the user feel like they're living in a blingee gif by default, I just desperately want pages to respect prefers-reduced-motion

What are the times in which it is useful?

If those are referenced in the linked article, I'll be honest I didn't read it. That website succeeds whole handedly in its job of being too annoying to read.


To be honest I don't know of any, I just didn't want to be outright dismissive of it. If you just use it for a header to have some kind of small animation that grabs the reader's attention I guess it's fine. Just don't use it for the main text body.

Some news articles work well with a long scroll. Usually to progress through the "time" of the article. But yeah most of the time it's just annoying.

im sure theres a class of people who gauge their willingness to read based on the length of scroll.

I am reaching for “reader mode” in my browsers all the time as they cut through these design choices that don’t agree within my eyes

It really helps to focus in the content rather than the fluff.


I should probably be doing this instead of fruitlessly expanding my blocklist. I'm frustrated that extensions don't work in reader view though.

Another good introduction, full-nonsense: http://landoflisp.com/

Land of Lisp is actually a very, very bad introduction.

Konform Browser

Mullvad Browser

Tor Browser for those occasions


Obscurity isn't security but it can support security. Until it doesn't.

I think I got the difference in my head. How about this:

Obscurity is decreasingly effective as more people use it. Security is more effective as more people use it.


I think I agree. But at the same time we have strength in numbers and people will find something close to what they want and fork off that.

So I think the same thesis holds for audiences of 10-100 and 100-1000.

A cambrian explosion of software.


It transformed. Same name, different browser.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Midori_%28web_bro...

> programming language = originally in [[C (programming language)|C]] & GTK2, rewritten completely in [[Vala (programming language)|Vala]] & GTK3<ref>{{cite web

Very different browser.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: