That's not the workflow your GP is describing.

Doesn't work for me. Like the GP, I get results unrelated to Lowes, bedding or even pets.

DDG for more than a year when there's nothing to show for the phrase, it dumps some unrelated stuff but somehow tied to my location.

Out of curiosity, I noticed (as I mentioned in a reply to your sibling) I could produce unrelated results by fiddling with the region; does changing region do anything for you?

Just tried to test it out and I'm now seeing correct results when I set the region to 'US' and an empty list of results when using my own region. This is not at all what I was seeing earlier.

Perhaps they're A/B testing or something?

How is it supposed to work? I expect to see only those results that contain an exact match on the entire phrase between the quotes but perhaps I've misunderstood?

> I don't think anything will happen to $TSLA's CEO unless except through malice aimed at his peers that affects their wealth.

He needs to watch out for the Saudis, for sure.

Windows Terminal?

Rancher Desktop has been rock solid for my use cases for at least the last year or so.

But then you have to laboriously unflip half of them to put them away. Unless you are cutlery pointing in both directions like a Philistine?

My wife requires that we have cutlery pointing in both directions, in two neatly sorted piles, to optimize space usage and look good. But we also sort into the drawer not the dishwasher (I have to sort at least once, so it seems faster to me not to do it twice by sorting the dishwasher too)

I have literally never once worried about whether my family are secretly peeing into mugs, emptying them and planting them into an empty dishwasher.

I guess now I will.

FWIW ECS supports rolling updated for docker compose deployments: https://docs.docker.com/cloud/ecs-integration/#rolling-updat...

Anecdotally, it's not just the lowest performers who are being laid off.

Also entrenched high performers with extremely high salaries (to be replaced with young enthusiasts at the beginning of their career cycles), also some random people too — just like a simulated annealing schedule for performance optimization.

I am not defending the moral side of these decisions, just saying that this is how all corporations aiming to maximize shareholders value work.

Yes, you can be a good performer working on a failed product (stadia, HoloLens, ...). If the product is cut, you might be let go.

There's also Adam Tornhill's [0] Codescene. [1]

[0] https://www.amazon.com/Books-Adam-Tornhill/s?rh=n%3A283155%2... [1] https://codescene.com/