Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | muragekibicho's commentslogin

Google Trends shows that the Stanford area has the most worldwide searches for 'Orthogonal' when ranked by city.


ngl, i stole his website design. this is the content i live for

I googled ear.org. Complete waste tbh. It's just blank


The java, it is scripting, all day, every day, hakol hayom


Your thesis is valid until "without plastering the AWS brand all over it." Lol


yeah what I meant by that was like, I have to signup via AWS console or something stupid like that - i mis-explained my thought


AWS Builder Id does not require an AWS account, just an email address and that's pretty much it.

https://us-east-1.credentials.signin.aws/


From the README:

> After installation, authenticate through IAM Identity Center or AWS Builder ID.


RIP


some people just mastered their domain. i pray i get this good in my area of expertise: elliptic curves. lol im researching curves on random math sites, and learning different implementation tricks (like the subtle diff in MSB and LSB implementations of the double and add algorithm* or that sometimes you can find the weirdest endomorphisms on non-binary Koblitz curves (they're not documented AFAIK and Koblitz the OG is too old to be chasing 1-bit, 2-bit endomorphisms)

This was me in awe of the pokemon card CSS lol. It appears to have been done before AI and this makes it even more impressive tbh.

*The diff is in MSB->LSB the generator remains constant while in LSB->MSB to the generator doubles. Either way, you always know the value of the generator at every bit. I think this is a vulnerability but I just can't find out how.


Exactly. I was building a WASM lib using Emscripten and this was the exact question I could not answer


Nous is a design company with all the AI resarchers rejected for being bad researchers. That's a hill I'll die on.


That's not necessarily a bad thing.


> with all the AI resarchers rejected for being bad researchers.

TBF, I've heard the team at xai called "bunch of amateurs" by people who've previously worked (with them) at big labs. For a bunch of amateurs, they've caught up with SotA just fine.


Turns out a bunch of amateurs will outperform experts when the experts are forced to spend 80% of their effort ensuring their models don’t accidentally say factual yet impolite things or make any users have big feelings.


I thought it's really just one guy who does the Nous aesthetic?


Doing a good job if people think it’s a whole team


Can you please clarify some things:

* Rejected by whom?

* By what definition of bad?

* You’ll die on a hill for what reason?


Exactly! The most important thing is to start.


I always thought his experience at Groupon made him a master of Reed Solomon error correction.

I saw Reed Solomon codes were invented for fast, accurate missile guidance and (in my head) that's the connection I made to his super sonic startup


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: