What a ridiculous reply to a perfectly reasonable comment.

Literal decades of mismanagement.

“statistically significantly more likely to correctly identify black participants than participants from other ethnic groups”.

Great. Wasn’t the problem before always that it couldn’t correctly identify non-white people? It does it accurately now. That is somehow also a problem? It should make more mistakes?

I do

I respect you. It's very hard to be passionate about something as bland as a Chromebook. It's like being passionate about tofu, or toothpaste, or baby shampoo.

Me too

I recently helped liberate about 70 EOL'ed Chromebooks. Now students in a college near me will get free laptops they can actually use for college work, running the latest and greatest Linux distros.

SusyQ USB-C Cable + USB-A to USB-C Cable + Coreboot?

Recently liberated a Chromebook that powerwashed my hours of manual provisioning again due to remote login control failure FWICS

Can't believe how much faster the same machine is with a modern Linux distro.

(ChromiumOS was originally Gnome and Chrome on a Gentoo derivative by Linux workstation users, but now has a "Turn on Linux" button greyed out for all the kids.)

Mrchromebox > Supported Devices: https://docs.mrchromebox.tech/docs/supported-devices.html

It's possible to install a list of apps with a script on Win, Mac, and Linux computers.

Try to `adb install com.google.android.calculator`.

Which should be the security priority? App download counts or automated provisioning?

Oh well that's a different matter. Nobody hates acceptable cheap hardware.

Oh I thought it was a very dodgy process. Can you give some pointers? I will also ask an LLM?

Here you go

https://mrchromebox.tech/

This was it. It involved dismantling the machine, removing a screw, and some other maneuvers.

Depends on the Chromebook. Some use a screw as a write protect jumper, some do not.

Agreed. This was, so far, my worst experience with liberation of locked down machines. It’s fun that it scaled to that many units.

> naming them is perhaps invasion of privacy?

No. The President of the United states is Donald Trump. His address is 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and his phone number is 202-456-1414.

> Lying however would be slander and illegal…

They couldn't prove he did.

I’d argue that’s rather different than just a cop somewhere.

He said they were criminals, and that the woman was actually a man..

My understanding is he said "Adams county sheriff's are crooks because they took my money" (which is not disputed)., and individual officers, who weren't actually mentioned by name, sued because someone else was responsible for taking the money

> He said they were criminals, and that the woman was actually a man.

If that were defamatory, 90% of QAnon would be in court.

“ No database, no ORM, no serialization. Pure framework overhead.”

And many more examples. Great, another AI written article.

I feel dumb now. I already wrote a comment about this useless slop.

Management.

Nobody read their presentations and documents, and they are already using ChatGPT to make them and do their “mission, vision, strategy” bullshit

Dehydration? Overconsumption of carbohydrates?

I absolutely get out of the subway and orientate myself.

If I orient myself I have not taken the subway but the orient express, I’m afraid..

When I get out of the subway, I always occident myself.