I was amazed that the site still runs, apparently still using the same engine.
But it seems that it was a flash site (of course), and archive.org seems to replace Flash Player with "Ruffle" [1]. Either that, or someone of Tobin's team replaced Flash with Ruffle >= 2019.
Blue Ocean status
Blue Ocean will not receive further functionality updates.
Blue Ocean will continue to provide easy-to-use Pipeline visualization, but it will not be enhanced further. It will only receive selective updates for significant security issues or functional defects.
> Be specially careful when installing their extension pack, as it is an evaluation license.
Our company was targeted by Oracle Sales because they detected mere _downloads_ from our IP range. They couldn't prove any installations, but of course wanted the company to pay for commercial licenses.
Im not sure about the details, but in the end I think we bought a couple of licences & then blocked all URLs for the extension pack company-wide.
Probably not. But how would you feel about going up against Oracle's legal team to make the point? They, and other large companies, rely on this a lot when deciding upon whether or not to use dubious practises. I think Oracle's main business has become litigious & licensing arse-hole-ary, with everything else in their portfolio existing to support those functions, so they are rather good at it.
> After such an intrusion I wouldn't ever want to have anything to do with Oracle.
This sort of thing is why many people are wary of Oracle. The company has considerable form for this sort of thing and worse.
I had sales drones get me just for downloading VirtualBox as a whole from our IPs. They sent me an email, tagged High Importance even.
"My name is <name> and I am part of Oracle Open Source Linux & Virtualization team. I have got an internal notification from my team that you have shown interest in Oracle Virtual Box... I would like to schedule a time with you to discuss the use cases in your organization, our recent version 7 announcements, and how Oracle can assist you in getting the maximum value from this offering..."
I thought so too. Clicking around, I had a hunch when I saw "lightseagreen" that these were the old X11 colors, and went looking for "lemonchiffon" to confirm it. (From the text though it sounds like there are other sources as well.)
I did not and can't downvote, no I have no stake in this.
That said, in my opinion people working in such a workplace reading a post "Why “go nuts, show nuts” doesn’t work in 2022" should be savvy enough to not click links, or read the post in the first place.
Also, ironically, the fact that we have to mark such links (to Wikipedia!) as NSFW is exactly what this particular comment chain is about, no?
You're overthinking it. Well, it's in the name right? Its not safe for work. I'm in a semi-full conference room currently, and opening the link would be a bit awkward, as it would be really out of context for osmeone who have a view onto my screen.
It was definitely a valid remark, and in this case, it was useful at least for me.
I disagree that they're overthinking it, and you haven't addressed (or perhaps you overlooked?) their main point, that if this is true then you should have thought about that before opening _this_ link, instead of the links on this page.
This is more to say that this is a disagreement between you two at the object level, not someone overthinking a simple matter.
Ah, the ol' Hacker News "being a contrarian just to be a contrarian" thing.
Boobs on the screen isn't the greatest look at work or any public location, and I don't really think it requires going any deeper than that. I can appreciate the pointless debate here and there, but this isn't some great philosophical question we have here lol.
Yeah. It's not just a prudish workplace policy thing. There is definitely stuff I wouldn't want on a screen in an office workplace policies notwithstanding because someone could take offense whether reasonably IMO or not. For that matter, there are almost certainly (non-porn) films I wouldn't go out of my way to watch on a plane especially if there were children nearby.
But it seems that it was a flash site (of course), and archive.org seems to replace Flash Player with "Ruffle" [1]. Either that, or someone of Tobin's team replaced Flash with Ruffle >= 2019.
[1] https://ruffle.rs/