As a CTO I would guess something from 4% - 6% some will get more depending on a number of factors. The thing is a CTO could get 10%, but if it is a bad idea or mismanaged then that 10% might be worth $0 after 4 years.
A well managed, great idea might still get you $0 but it might also get you $1,000,000. You never know. You have to way up if you think this idea is something which will be viable.
If you are pulling out the Django templates and the ORM you should just use Flask. You shouldn't choose a framework and then immediately start taking it apart if there is an alternative that comes the way you want basically out of the box.
I learned a lot from reading the Django codebase. I didn't read it like a book, I read parts of it as I tried to figure out how to do things in Django, but I never felt like the code was bad. This was around 5 years ago so it's possible things have gotten more convoluted since then.
If the OP wants to grok a small, discrete codebase then I agree that Django is not what he's looking for.
No, definitely no. Django aged well in terms of being alive, usable and comfortable to use in most usecases.
But the codebase... Let me explain. Currently it works as "pay-to-get-a-feature" by crowdfounding. It not a bad thing, it gives good features we all need, but it is a bit sad fact when you look at Rails.
So, it doesn't mean Django developers doesn't care about code, they care. But codebase is so big and complicated(because some code needs to be refactored)... it is common to see that some bug cannot be simply fixed by two lines, because some core member insists "this all should be reworked".
Surely you should know the problems if you are working for an anti-scraping company.... Anyway...
Most people who own small website dont necessarily know there website is being scrapped on a daily basis (talking sole traders, tiny businesses). If they are paying for adwords or local advertising through parish or county community websites then they may think they are getting bang for the buck than they actually think. If they get 10 visitors a day and 8 of those are scrapers what does this really mean for there advertising revenue. Obviously they should be basing there return on investment against revenue but still a website is seen as a big thing for most small businesses.
Yes, it is very true that many fail to realize that they are getting scraped simply because there aren't many tools which show the traffic classified among humans and bots. This surely is a problem. Thanks for leaving a comment!
For a lot of people paypal is just fine and does the job they need it to do.
Its like the mac fan boys who comment on windows being crap. But for 90% of joe public it works and works well allowing them to edit word documents and browse the interweb. Its just the loud mouthed 10% who like to cry their balls off and tell people what they are using is wrong.
Yes, I appreciate it's not constructive. To be honest, they've been fine for me for a long time, it's only recently when I've been scammed and now have to deal with their support team I've realised how much they're not "for the buyer" or "for the seller", they're very much just for themselves. I've had awful customer service from ISP's, mobile phone networks, online retailers and many more - but all of those combined wouldn't add up to equate how terrible the service I've had from PayPal. You know a company is shady when there are dedicated hate websites setup to warn people against using it.
I'll be moving to Google Wallet + Stripe in all of my personal expenses and personal projects where possible.