Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lemonlym's comments login

Another great resource on RL is Mykel Kochenderfer's suite of textbooks: https://algorithmsbook.com/


These books are all RL? I’ve got the decision one, I didn’t think the other had anything to do with RL.


He (author) has a strong proclivity for policy-based planning, shall we say.


Additionally, Stanford's Code in Place has open accessed all of their python materials https://codeinplace.stanford.edu


This is impressive, so congratulations. I also think that this is a great example of how open source can simply lead to faster and better acceleration.


https://whir.tech/ It's a bit silly but I'm enjoying it so far.


I suppose the difference here is that the content will look different unique enough to fool these tools. Bots copy and paste stuff all the time, but now it seems it would be easier to fake an a surge of unique human responses.


What high-quality websites are going to be linking to this content to make it rank though?


Interesting case and I appreciate you raising the point. I definitely see what you mean, however, I could see the quality going from trying to spam a post with irrelevant content to spamming with relevant but incorrect content. Again though, you're right that many current systems do seem to work to a reasonable extent.


I'd go to what "karma" is providing. An indication at some level of inherent trust in what people reflect on what they see. The problem would of course be that if the bots start voting karma, then karma will inherently decline as a source of value.

I probably go to verified identity. Thats going to upset a lot of people who want pseudonymous posting to be underpinned by substantive anonymity behind it.

I think in the case of ChatBPT and GPT, I want the AI to have "Hologram" H tattoo on their foreheads for some time yet.


As the content becomes even more indistinguishable from human written content, wouldn't it be valuable to bad actors who wish to perpetrate heaps of unique writing representing their perspective? Not trying to fear monger (although I may sound like it) but while I agree 99.9% of people will stop posting "AI wrote this blog post" etc blogs, there are bound to be parties that begin mass producing content and infiltrating the non tech savvy person's timeline?


Sounds like fear mongering. Its not something you need to worry about because the internet is already filled with paid influencers parroting the same info.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: