We're a very small company (10 FTEs), but we have been anything but impressed with Zenefits as a customer. We only use them for medical and dental insurance, but in reality, they provide very little, if any value. The Zenefits software is really nothing special, and in fact, the onboarding UI is pretty poor. Now that we have our insurance, Zenefits adds zero value to us. We deal directly with United and Zenefits collects a 10% commission on our monthly premiums. Its a genius business model, and little else.
Zenefits doesn't have any intrinsic rights to ADP's system. Twitter killed off plenty of companies when it decided to shut down the 3rd party ecosystem. Facebook obviously maintains similar strategic control over it's API. How many case studies must there be for companies to understand that building on another company's platform always carries business and strategic risks?
I, too, have a small company and so far I'm definitely not impressed with Zenefits.
A trivial example: we have roughly fifteen contractors working for us. I had them all sign up for Zenefits so we could pay them (and track 1099's appropriately). Come the first of the month, we tried to pay the contractors, only to discover that we had a cap of $2,500 TOTAL for any given week.
This isn't mentioned anywhere obvious and caused huge problems for us. In the end, we had to Paypal everyone money at the last minute.
Next up was trying to pay a founder as the sole employee in a single state. No matter how much we try, we can't seem to figure out how to make this happen - the Zenefits software assumes that we need a tax ID for the state but the state itself insists that we don't need one (since it's a solo founder, working from his home, there is no LNI and no income tax either).
Then there were the countless issues with email addresses (an infinite loop that seemed to be caused by the fact that I used an email address with a plus symbol on it)
The support people are very nice but so far none of them have managed to actually resolve an issue for me.
I too run a small company and am a Zenefits customer. We've now done ~15 payroll runs with Zenefits and only 3 have worked without my manual intervention to fix a problem at the last minute. I don't think this will be the only lawsuit in their future.
Having used both ADP and Peak Payroll at our company in the past we have experienced a lot of manual intervention at both. Usually things get ironed out until some/any out of the ordinary change causes problems that end up taking a payroll or two to correct. Basically I'm saying that all payroll providers seem to have these problems.
We're back on ADP after our company was bought as that is what the parent company uses.
Payroll and benefits management is a classic hard problem.
Now granted, with half a billion dollars and some technical acumen major innovation is possible. But the events of this week and the bearing of the CEO paint a picture of a company that is not aware of and focused on that hard problem.
For small businesses, Zenefits and other brokers offer almost exactly the same rates, which are the list rates of the insurance companies. The negotiation only comes in to play with larger companies (currently 50+ employees, next year it will be 100+, I think). For us, Zenefits seemed slightly more expensive, but it is hard to tell since they didn't give us good comparison data based on employee ages and coverage.
If you want to leverage the large company rates as a small company, you need to explore the PEO model, which Zenefits does not support, but ADP does (and several others).
We got cheaper rates with a 'boutique' insurance firm that was smaller. You can get even cheaper by going the PEO route, but we decided that wasn't a route we wanted to go down.
Zenefits does not get any special deals; you get the same deal as every other 'small business' broker.
Nope. In our experience, Zenefits has no special deals and absurdly high pricing for health insurance for small companies. You're far better off going with a PEO (e.g. Trinet etc.)
> Zenefits doesn't have any intrinsic rights to ADP's system.
Zenefits doesn't want or need intrinsic rights to the ADP system. They do need (and deserve) the same level of access as a human working for a client using ADP. They might provide little to no value or be a worthless company but NONE OF THAT MATTERS. The client paid for ADP access and has every right to use whatever means they deem necessary to input or output data from the ADP system.
The client paid for ADP access and has every right to use whatever means they deem necessary to input or output data from the ADP system.
Thats not actually what the client pays for though. The client paid for access to ADP's system according to the Terms of Service that ADP sets. If those terms of service and the rights they engender are not acceptable to the client they are welcome to find another provider.
I've frequently posted my dislike for ADP on these boards and I took my business elsewhere.
>The client paid for ADP access and has every right to use whatever means they deem necessary to input or output data from the ADP system.
Surely ADP has a superseding right to determine how information enters and leaves their system? I'm not suggesting that's good or bad, just pointing out that it's their system, being a customer doesn't give you carte blanche to do whatever you like.
The system in question was clearly built to meet the scale of human users, not synchronization with third-party automation systems. That, to me, is the issue here - not the question of access, but of purpose.
ADP is clearly responding to a capacity issue but Zenefits is attempting to frame it as a competitive one.
>They do need (and deserve) the same level of access as a human working for a client using ADP.
What is the scale of Zenefits' access? Do they function like a human or as a machine? Isn't treating machines differently than humans a well accepted standard of the tech industry? Why else would Robots.txt exist?
Twitter has become the definitive source for breaking news, rumors and off the cough analysis in Sports. Scoops always appear on Twitter considerably faster than ESPN, etc. During free agency periods, all of the rumors and news breaks on Twitter first because all of the top traditional journalists and bloggers use Twitter as their primary distribution channel. If I were running ESPN, I would have tried my hardest to head this off years ago, perhaps by emulating the StockTwits strategy or something, but at this point, Twitter is the breaking source for Sports information, not ESPN. And that's why I use it multiple times per day on the web.
Facebook may be generating significant mobile revenue, but the core Facebook mobile / app strategy is suspect. Poke, Home and Paper have all been flops, and it's hard to imagine Slingshot faring any better.
Marijuana should be legal because the US is supposed to be a free country and there is no reason it should be illegal. Tax revenue is a dirty justification that only demonstrates the extreme hypocrisy. It should never be the justification for legality or illegality. The whole discussion about tax revenue allocation is nothing more than red herring. A 25% tax is nothing more than extreme government theft.
Well said. But that's the conflict of America - lip-service to freedom on the one hand, extreme moral conservatism and idiotic public policy on the other.
However, I'm at a complete loss when trying to understand why Intel Capital would lead or even participate in the financing of an e-commerce merchant. I can't imagine Intel Capital's investment mandate is this broad.
Goldbely is a logistics company. While it's true they're doing food, logistics of this nature could be applied to other fields pretty easily.
The hardest part is setting up initial distribution and sourcing; once that's done, adding product lines becomes fairly trivial. That's how I perceive the Intel involvement.
Goodsie (http://goodsie.com) provides modern e-commerce software for small and medium size retailers.
REMOTE: We are looking for a full-stack Python developer based anywhere in the United States, with a preference for the East Coast or Midwest (EST or CST time zone).
A strong expertise in Python/Django is required. Experience with Backbone.js or administering AWS services is preferred.
Compensation, equity and health benefits are very competitive.
Our team has a strong track record in the consumer Internet sector with experience from Vimeo, Pentagram and IAC.
Please send an email with a resume and Github code samples to jonathan at goodsie dot com.
According to Aaron Greenspan in his recent lawsuit "a vast sum, if not the majority, of Dwolla’s transaction volume is the result of Bitcoin speculation."
So it should be interesting to see what impact this has on Dwolla's business.
Wouldn't it be the responsibility of Mt.Gox and Dwolla to submit the required forms? Unless you are saying you think having money in Mt.Gox qualifies as a foreign account and he should have filed an FBAR.
I'm not a financial expert by any means but it's pretty clear when you're moving cash to Mt. Gox, you're moving it out of the country. And I think the paperwork is a joint responsibility.
If they do ACH, it's never really settled, it just hasn't returned yet. Some classes of returns are limited to 3 days, some 60, and some can be clawed back a year later.
Their proprietary exchange might have different rules, but iirc, it's not very widely distributed yet.
The main impact will be on their gross processing volume, which is in some respects a vanity metric because of their pricing model. Revenue will be impacted, but as your example illustrates, not directly or proportionately.
Zenefits doesn't have any intrinsic rights to ADP's system. Twitter killed off plenty of companies when it decided to shut down the 3rd party ecosystem. Facebook obviously maintains similar strategic control over it's API. How many case studies must there be for companies to understand that building on another company's platform always carries business and strategic risks?