This is ridiculous, it's subjective, and it's really punitive in a political way. The NSDAP has made huge gains in Germany, the people voted for that, how dare the intelligence service say oh, this is far right. It's the same as if they had said, it was far left. The government has no business in deciding which party can field candidates. That's the voters to choose.
I've been ID'ed as a teenager when I was trying to buy Skyrim, which at the time was rated for audiences older than me. Gamestop and electronic retailers also generally didn't have teenage employees.
Maybe it's just because they're anticipating fallout from an escalation over Taiwan?
Large US tech companies would be crippled because they'd suddenly loose access to top chips and manufacturing capacity over night.
By voting for their people to become judges, just like it has been done in the US.
This is why the current democratic parties voted recently to change how this voting is weighted [0], in order to make it more resilient.
> Central guidelines on the structure and working methods of the court are now anchored in the Basic Law, meaning that they can only be changed with a two-thirds majority.
> In order to prevent a blocking minority and blockages in the election of judges in the event of a possible change in the majority situation in the future, the SPD, the Union, the Greens and the FDP have agreed on a replacement election mechanism. If there is no two-thirds majority, the right to vote can be transferred from the Bundestag to the Bundesrat and vice versa.
> Can't wait to see what this boneheaded President's tarrif on TSMC does to this situation.
Can you please provide a source? Genuinely curious as this would be fatal to the US economy. Imagine working 2 years to get out from Covid chip shortages only to hammer progress down with tariffs.
I'd be delighted to see PG behind a paywall so I would never have to consume his content again, but I have the feeling the man is too affluent to ever need the side hustle.
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2023143707A1/en?inventor...
reply