Would he resign if Google took a position in a non political debate but a scientific debate?

http://linkaudit.co/blog/google-takes-side-in-controversial-...

I don’t think these people would classify themselves as “anti vaccine”, they would classify as “safe vaccine advocates”. That’s the open question which has real science begging this question. But that is not the point of that article which is about whether google should be engaging in scientific disputes, political disputes, etc.

Vaccines are already safe, to the best of our testing.

Google is a private service, and in theory could censor anything they wanted.

Anti-vaccine isn't just a joke, but a serious threat to the survivability of the human race.

Just curious, have you read much into the subject? rather than having a cursory knowledge on the subject... Hint. if you do, you might start getting more concerned and be less trusting.

Have you got some handy links?

IN THE ARticle linked above if you care to click through to the internal links in the article you will get some interesting wider information. However. The important part of the article is not that vaccines have un acknowledged safety issues or not but that google have decided to take a position. That leads to google taking a position in any topical subject right?

those discounts look expensive. go get some real deals on there and see if things change, even if you give it away to see if its the prices your offeirng are too high

so the conviencince of booking online, and reserving all in one shot and not having to take out your wallet at the restaurant, isn't enough? we'd need a really compelling discount to make people take action and find real value? What kind of discounts are we talking, 35-50%? Or in other words, what would it have to be, for you to use it? IF you would use it, or maybe you wouldn't, and if so, why?

I'm in Cascais, ive been navigating the NHR program since I arrived last year, its a loverly place, lisbon has a cool scene, they hosting websimmit this year which will put it on the map totally. You can get me at this address support / linkaudit.co.uk

Confirmed

To make sure you continue having the best experience possible on LinkedIn, we're regularly monitoring our site and the Internet to keep your account information safe. We've recently noticed a potential risk to your LinkedIn account coming from outside LinkedIn. Just to be safe, you'll need to reset your password the next time you log in. Here's how: Go to the LinkedIn website. Next to the password field, click the "Forgot your password" link, and enter your email address. You'll get an email from LinkedIn asking you to click a link that will help you reset your password. Once you've reset your password, a confirmation email will be sent to the confirmed email addresses on your account. Thanks for helping us keep your account safe, The LinkedIn Team

Question for John Doe. Where's the missing American names and other retracted elements. Further given his naive calls for governments to do something to fix the problem seems naive to the extreme since they were the ones who created the 'problem' or backdoors in the first place

How do you know there are missing American names? It was my understanding when this leak happened that Mossack Fonseca didn't have that many American clients, because Americans still have to pay tax if they try to hide their money in Panama. Admittedly, I have no clue what I'm talking about - but I'm quite curious how it is you know that Americans are being overtly excluded from this action?

This is terrible news and with Pagerank also disabled recently, now 2 features of our domain health testing service has been crippled. Pagerank was easy to replace with moz rank but this data was irreplaceable due to the fact that it was specific and unique to google. Rip one of our main tools.

PageRank had been completely useless for a couple of years, and practically useless for several years before that.

That depends on your reason of usage, as a guide to web ranks its been obsolete as you say for years, but as a cheap and quick measure of a domains potential (for passing link juice or to compare link juice between two domains) in comparison against another, Pagerank had some value.

This matters to tech startups because as many grow internationally they will navigate international banks and local laws and tax polices which will undoubtably challenge them with compliance issues and thus suffer risks beyond their control and could face direct impact from sanctions imposed by FinCEN!

I cant use a proxy but or use the .co.uk tld, i have to use the com and it has to be controlled via the parameters added to the url? any more ideas?