Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | janwl's commentslogin

Why exactly? Why are these games of chance moral only if the government gets a cut?


Regulation also means that children are excluded, debt is not allowed, and all chips can be settled for cash when the player leaves the property. Even the comps are regulated. The majority of casinos in the US are Indian casinos. When they aren't and are taxed by the government those funds are usually used to improve and fund the local area giving the local citizens the ability to decide, through legislation, if it should be continued or outlawed.

Finally, Steam pays taxes in the US, so the government is already "getting a cut." Games of chance are not moral. Unregulated games of chance are flatly evil.


Games of chance are absolutely moral and completely fine when played by adults who are not mentally incapacitated.


Gambling houses make the most money from "adults who are mentally incapacitated"


>The "I'm okay being miserable as long as you're more miserable" crowd has always had a strong showing in this country.

If the choices are "I am miserable whilst my enemies are happy" and "I am miserable whilst my enemies are even more miserable", I know what I would choose.


There's a loosely related joke, which might apply a little...

A person discovers a genie in a bottle, and is given 3 wishes, but with the condition that their worst enemy will receive double the wish.

"For my first wish, I would like a billion dollars"

Genie nods. Person is surrounded by stacks of dollars and gold. "Your enemy gets two billion."

"For my second wish, I would like a mansion."

Genie nods. Person is transported to a beautiful mansion. "Done. Your enemy gets two mansions."

"Now beat me half to death."


> If the choices are "I am miserable whilst my enemies are happy" and "I am miserable whilst my enemies are even more miserable", I know what I would choose.

THOSE ARE NOT ALL THE DAMN CHOICES!

How about we try: "make everybody less miserable". Could we please try voting for that? Maybe?

And who the fuck are your "enemies"? The poor people down the street? The poor people in the rural areas? The poor people in the cities? What the hell did they do to YOU, PERSONALLY to warrant being your "enemy"?

Cries in Vonnegut.


Kernel-level anti cheats are not perfect, but they decrease the amount of cheaters to the point where they stop being “common” and become “extremely rare”. An imperfect solution is much better than no solution.


What are the chances phones in 10 years won’t be able to connect to the cars with CarPlay or Android auto from today.


Definitely not zero (unfortunately).


Consider you may be spending too much time reading West-aligned news sources.


I haven't found much utility in reading Russian-language sources, though I can read the language.

Unfortunately I'm not extrapolating, this fits within a very mature pattern. See 'Little Green Men' in lead-up to Ukraine invasion and the drones violating airspace that Poland has been shooting down.


Show any weakness, any concession, any compromise, blink and you get invaded. Its not complicated. They communicate it pretty blatantly internally. And once you are invaded, they do a settlement and education program to have a reason for interventions. The chamberlains of europe and the us, talking to themselves about peace, are inviting them.


Have there been any leaks of internal communications?


because everything that Russia-aligned news sources say about the war in Ukraine makes a grand and indivisible amount of sense.


Nowhere in my comment do I say that.


Piracy is a service problem. Maybe if this is happening at such a scale, cigarettes are too highly taxed.


Just from googling around because I also had this question.

It doesn't look like it's so much a tax issue as it is a labor issue. (Well, it is a tariff issue and tariffs are taxes).

My guess is that they aren't growing enough tobacco to meet local demand which has ultimately kicked up prices.


Who is they reffering to? I doubt any tobacco is grown at a commercial scale Europe.

EDIT: Wikipedia would indicate there is tobacco production within Europe. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/83/TobaccoY...


I had to also look that up. I thought this was specifically a Lithuania thing. It looks like it's both Lithuania and EU regulations. I didn't realize Lithuania was an EU member.


That's the point, though. The taxes are there to discourage use. Certainly smuggling from lower-tax or tax-free places is going to be expected in that scenario, but it doesn't mean that the higher taxes aren't working for the intended purpose. Sure, they're working less than they could have in the absence of smuggling, which you probably are never going to be able to fully stamp out, but that's ok.


People throw “Anti-regulation” around in HN as if it were a slur.


I thought people here hated it when LLMs made http requests?


It's bad when they indiscriminately crawl for training, and not ideal (but understandable) to use the Internet to communicate with them (and having online accounts associated with that etc.) rather than running them locally.

It's not bad when they use the Internet at generation time to verify the output.


Also for the most part this verification can use a HEAD request.


I don't know for certain what you're referring to, but the "bulk downloads" of the Internet that AI companies are executing for training are the problem I've seen cited, and doesn't relate to LLMs checking their sources at query time.


Linux is a kernel. We don’t have a usable operating system to go with it besides Android.


Point of order: We have several usable OS to go with it, just not that target phones and have good hardware support.


This law was supposed to give me control of my data. If I have control of my data, why can't I use it to pay the owner of the website?


Click-through "I agree" buttons are almost never a matter of informed consent and almost always a matter of convenience-driven rape.


You can freely share your data under GDPR but the owner of the website can not request data as form of payment for the access to the website.


That doesn’t seem to give me much freedom about my data - in fact it seems like it took freedom away from me.


> it seems like it took freedom away from me

And it *gave* freedom to society not to have their personal data exploited and privacy invaded for corporate profit.


Yes, we live in a society. You aren't allowed to do anything you want. But you are wrong. You had no option before, now you have. How is that taking away freedom from you?


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: