Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | j_maffe's commentslogin

Did Israel peacefully withdraw from the Golan Heights? No? Unilateral annexation condemened by nearly everyone in the international community.

Is there peace with Syria? No? So no unilateral withdrawal.

> aesthetics are a type of philosophy.

What philosophy is that?


It's literally called aesthetics, the philosophical approach is the original meaning of the word - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aesthetics

Properly, focusing on aesthetics as an ethic would be practicing the philosophy of aestheticism - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aestheticism



> Shares in the California-based company rose by about 6% following news of the proposed settlement.


Personally, as someone coming from a region that has suffered many times over by the actions of this so called "Ministry of Defense," I feel like "Department of War" is a more accurate and honest term.


As I've noted multiple times here on HN, I don't disagree with this.

But the question is not about whether it is a more accurate and honest term. It is about people complying in advance with the illegal/extra-legal renaming of a federal agency by a president who does not have the right or authority to do so.

If we were talking about Congress voting to rename the DoD as the DoW, I'd have nothing to say on the matter that differed from your observation.


Yeah that's fair you guys should still call it DoD. I think I'm gonna stick to DoW from here on out though.


If that were true then the Windows phones would've survived. You need the app ecosystem.


That would be a breeding ground for malware.


The capability to ...read their own keys that they set up?


You mean like the android play store already is?


> WhatsApp is out of the question for a huge portion of the population.

What an insane take this is.


How is it an insane take? My mother is in her seventies, has an iphone, and can't seem to figure out how to put me on speakerphone when I call her. It's a struggle to get her to do much of anything on there. My father is even worse. They didn't grow up with the technology like younger generations did and just don't get it.


At the same time, there's plenty of people who didn't grow up with the technology and manage to navigate their devices fine. I had to teach an elder what the notifications bar was because their children never bothered to explain it. We should take some responsibility instead of being ageist by assuming old people are dumb.


> assuming old people are dumb

Not just old people. Hackernews skews technical and seems to mostly interact with other technical people.

There are people in their 30's, 40's and 50's who don't own a computer at all (other than a smartphone), don't interact with computers on a regular basis, and almost exclusively use the built-in talk/text/browser apps that come pre-installed.

It may be a relatively small percentage of the adult population in the US, but it is still many millions of people.


Some of it isn't them being dumb, it's them being stubborn. My dad has been using computers since the 80s and used probably every Microsoft OS from DOS to 11. Give him a Linux PC and he could probably fumble his way around. Try to tell him what the notification bar is on Android and he just straight up won't listen. He doesn't want to hear it. He doesn't want to know how to type without poking at individual keys on mobile. He doesn't want to know what the difference is between an app and a website. He doesn't want to know what the home screen/launcher is. Many older people have issues with understanding. Many have no problems with understanding. And many just don't want to know. Some people just want things to work the way they always have (and they have a point: there's no excuse for Microsoft changing how their mail app interface works every 3-5 years)


If someone is calling themselves a warmonger, they should be called a warmonger.


100%. But the names of US agencies are not the names of people, and not determined by individuals, even the warmongers.


To go against moral principles purely for extra money is not "average human." And even if you think it's the case, it's equally as unacceptable as a fascist/supremacist/etc.


People are morally gray as proven by history.

And simple logic says that morally gray can't be as bad as morally dark, but hey, whatever floats your righteousness boat...


You're speaking as if the image of the US as a bully is anything new. It's only Europeans know that are getting a taste of US strong-arming.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: