Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more isbvhodnvemrwvn's comments login

Keep in mind that you'd probably need to be contractor to work for the company (as it costs money to get employer of record, never mention employer contribution) so you should give that amount a hefty discount.


They do open offices and they do pay little compared to the US, but still relatively good for the market.


They watched "Yes, Minister" and took it as a guide:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Y4PEqvk0Jg


If you don't want to change anything you can just submit it with one click.


Sales handing out Office365 discounts and trying to convince people that AWS and GCP is going to steal their data, judging by companies I worked for that used Azure.


Wasnt it true? Thas Amazon abused their AWS position and stole their competitors data, so thats why Germany's retail businesses are building their own Clouds


Any links? Interested on reading more about this


Here’s one

https://www.wsj.com/articles/amazon-scooped-up-data-from-its...

The gist is that yes it’s true. They’d come out with their own Amazon Basics branded stuff and push it to the top.


But that's amazon, not AWS.


Some of the companies I worked for have removed my reviews, so I'm not so sure about that.


You're saying it is corruptible. But it doesn't have to be perfect to be useful. There's plenty of critical reviews on the platform. More than enough to take a peek into the problems some corps have before joining.


Yeah there's plenty of people who would get badly hurt if they fell from the level they show in the CV (or the level of their ego) to the level of skills they can actually show.


The technology already exists, shutting down a company and pretending that it doesn't doesn't solve the problem.


Wouldn't a local threat be more dangerous than a foreign one?


Exactly why I trust China with my sensitive data. They won’t cough it up to any random US government agency that just asks for it!


And other logical questions no one seems to be asking. But oh well China bad USA good.


It defeats the point, management of personal data is sole responsibility of companies. Why should browsers take responsibility for that?


A standardized protocol with a nice browser native UI?


That was called Do Not Track headers, and websites decided to both ignore it and use it for additional tracking.

The current situation is purely a result of advertising companies fucking you over, not because of Europe.


That would be the dream. Websites won't use it, though, and making a specific protocol mandatory by law would be quite bad in a couple of years when greedy data brokers figure out new ways to exploit people and their data.

P3P was an early version of this concept: a browser-native privacy control system. No websites used it, it was only ever implemented by Microsoft, and has been removed from the last remaining browsers a while back.

I think Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla coming together to set up a privacy protocol to replace cookie banners would be the right way to handle things. Until usable browser UI exists, there's no way to force the companies currently employing dark patterns to comply.


These companies consider the big green "I consent" button to be the nice UI. Or rather, they want to make sure it's the nicest UI.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: