From my experience the more exotic frameworks are often pushed at smaller companies by developers hoping they'll be hard to replace whereas big companies use what s most popular to ensure they can find replacements easily.
Htmx isn't a framework, and is usually embedded in a more popular backend-rendering framework like Django or rails. Htmx is just a library that removes the need for the most common client-side SPA features, (i.e. partial page updates).
Hotwire is created by Basecamp which also houses the main creators of Rails.
Basecamp has been around for ~20 years. I have a lot of confidence that it'll be around and supported because it's a substantial part of the stack involved with a real world application that is their primary business. It's also from a group of folks who have an impeccable track record for supporting the tools they use.
I hate Apple, but every time I run something resource intensive on my laptop and it starts to sound like a plane going to take off I go to Apple.com and hover over Check out button. Once there is a reliable way to run Linux on M1/2 I'll switch.
If you run msoffice apps on a mac you'll be burning cpu like no ones business. I've a 2019 macbook pro 16, fans rev up regularly as excel (or power point, or word..) is using 100% cpu. The mac window manager process is a hog also. Honestly I switched to mac for work assuming "it just works" , but unfortunately it does not. M1 are likely better, but not overly impressed on the SW side.
Why do you think that Linux would run as fast or efficiently on an M1 Mac as an operating system that was designed from the ground up to run well on it?
For devs, MacOS is still pia. Asahi is still far behind. I just don’t get why Apple wouldn’t embrace Linux. Who’s stopping that from happening now that Jobs is gone?
And more “devs” are using Macs than Linux so it must not be too bad. That’s not even to mention that Android developers are saying Macs are fasted for development than x86 PCs and of course iOS developers are using Macs.
What benefit is there in “embracing Linux” for Apple? Better software? Better hardware support? Popularity?
I don't think it's about running faster, clearly OP wants to use Linux over MacOS, same for me. For dev work Linux is still king, and I happen to also personally prefer the KDE UX over MacOS.
So while Mac laptops are great hardware wise, it doesn't run the software I want, so that's why I'm still buying laptops made for Windows.
Mac laptops have bad GPUs generally though, that's why people I know who work on games have Windows laptops most of the time, basically beefy gaming laptops. Or to be honest most of them don't even use laptops and develop on a desktop for that same reason.
For graphics I don't know, probably depends what kind of graphics you're targeting. By king I didn't imply most popular, I doubt Linux is the most popular at anything honestly. I meant that I find it still excels at development because of the way the OS and userland tools are setup. If I needed to do some graphics programming and I could get away with using Linux for it I probably would still choose it.
But for graphics, unless we're talking 2D or simple stuff, I'd imagine you'd want some beefy GPU, and that means you're buying a PC which gives you the choice of Windows or Linux.
My complaint is that Mac laptops don't let you install Linux and MacOS didn't embrace Linux with something like WSL for example either, and that holds me back, because otherwise the laptops are very enticing.
I mean, it's my personal preference, I find having a good command line and package manager to be quite nice for development personally. And I prefer the KDE UX as well. I also like Unix as a whole, even the OS configuration is just code inside files.
And I think I associate the userland to be part of the OS. So for example, instead of thinking, oh I wish Windows had a better command line and package manager and got rid of the registry and used files instead as the main abstraction, I'm much more likely to wish that Nvidia released high quality drivers for Linux and that Unity had prime support for it.
You mean as in Vulcan and games, or rendering? Linux is your best choice unless you are using some Windows first framework like Unity. (AFAIK there is no OS X first one.)
Hum... You know you don't need to program on the same platform that your game will run, right? (I still don't know what you mean by "graphics", since it's not games.)
Otherwise creating a mobile game would be pretty insane.
Anything related to GPGPU programming with sane tooling like what NVidia Insights, Instruments, PIX are capable of.
Has RenderDoc finally started to support shader debugging, with watchpoints and and everything else that one expects?
Engines like Unreal and Unity.
Visualization tools like Maya, AutoCAD, Catia, 3D Painter, OctaneRender, InDesign, Photoshop, Illustrator,...
CMYK and other typesetting colour workflows tooling.
Yes probably you will refer one or two of those have a Linux version with a feature subset, which is ok, I guess, when the kingdom is actually a principality.
If it is king for dev work, it should win at it across the board, regardless of what work the dev does.
Game devs are also devs.
And in VFX, UNIX was already dominant thanks SGI, not Linux.
Which tend to use it for rendering farms in most cases, while graphics oriented people stick with macOS and Windows workstations for the daily workflows.
If money can't be explained it should be seized. The properties should be nationalised and then sold on auctions. Money should be used to rebuild Ukraine and legal assistance to get war criminals tried.
Probably semi related, but when I was looking at C/C++ job offers, why are they paid so little in comparison to Python or JavaScript?
It seems like C/C++ is much more complex. I was mainly looking at embedded stuff vs Web.
For example senior C++ role was paying £45k pa on average and over £60k for JS.
Difficulty of a job isn't a great metric to evaluate pay/salary, if that were the case then miners or gravediggers would be among the wealthiest people in the world. Salaries often have to do with marginal revenue productivity and from that metric, C++ is not a particularly productive programming language compared to its cost.
C++ is a very error prone, complex and risky language and even when used in industry, it's used in such a way that companies significantly restrict its feature set to a mostly sane subset of the language that in many cases looks like a dialect of C with classes. The benefit of using it is your product has the potential to outperform software written in other languages, but this benefit often comes at the cost of software that is more limited in features compared to competitors.
For some domains, like HFT, audio and graphics, where performance is the primary feature C++ does pay well, but for most other domains the sheer complexity of the language outweighs any benefit to productivity.
So ultimately the reason Python developers get paid more than C++ developers is because products developed in Python are more productive than products developed in C++. The reason for that difference in productivity is that given two developers who are both investing X units of time working a product, the Python developer is far more likely to spend that time adding new features to their product while the C++ developer is likely to spend that time trying to find the cause of some random bug due to undefined behavior, or trying to figure out some arcane and complex language quirk.
If it says "C/C++", it means they don't even know what they want, and might even be satisfied with a cave-dwelling C coder.
The highest-paid programming jobs are mainly held by C++ programmers, many of them in service of financial gambling. That work shades over into FPGA and HPC programming at the high end. A skilled C++ programmer at these shops can get a half $million, some more.
Yeah, job adverts (and resumes) with "C/C++" usually seem like they are reading off MS VisualStudio marketing and imo a clown indicator. I've seen this with jobs which were really C# or Java (or maybe even VB). Top C++ programmers are highly compensated and only unemployed when they want to be.
It has been literally decades since I last encountered it. In any case the title has exactly nothing to do with job listings or what may be inferred from them.
> Experience using scripting languages such as bash, Python, and PowerShell, or compiled languages such as C/C++, C# and Go are most relevant, but others are acceptable
"Software Engineer, Core, Compilers, Runtimes and Toolchains" @ Google
So, you are saying that clueless HR people are employed at such very large companies as NVidia, Microsoft, Google, Apple, IBM, AMD, and ARM? I'll bet you can find cigarette smokers working in them, too. And Russian Empire sympathizers.
If you ever had a point, you lost it some time ago.
See no reason why Russia should not be forced to withdraw completely - leaving Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk.
It's Ukraine time to retake their lands from the occupier.
They are committing genocide, run concentration camps and forced labour. They actively threat Taiwan. That's more than enough to justify avoiding them.
You're link is dead. Here [1] is a fairly nuanced take that concludes that most scholars would call what is happening "genocide," particularly due to the forced sterilizations.
Regardless of whether it matches everyone's exact definition, it's clearly an atrocity.
In there, they say frame it as an attack on minorities, but then they describe it as being applicable to people who already have 3 or more children. They just finished up a 1 child policy for the entire country and the Han majority are still reproducing below replacement levels.
There is plenty to disagree with about their policies, but it's not genocide.
It's a shame there are not very many devices working in audio range (sub 100khz).
You still have to scout eBay for a device from the 80s-90s and they are still expensive as hell.
“ Cannabinoids Promote Progression of HPV-Positive Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma via p38 MAPK Activation”
That is the study name. You are referencing the title of the press release from the university they work at.
While it’s perfectly fair to discuss the historical context of words, it’s important that we also recognize that using commonly used terminology in translating science for public consumption is necessary.
It’s also important to get basic facts right before trying to criticize peoples research.
Can you explain? The title paper is 'Cannabinoids Promote Progression of HPV-Positive Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma via p38 MAPK Activation'. You are probably refering to their press release.
I hope they won't kill their CPLD line that has been obsoleted several times and then pushed back.
It's a lifesaver for designing digital circuits if you don't want to use a ton of 74 chips.
It was my understanding Lattice's FPGAs / CPLDs are more tailored for the smaller (possibly hobbyist scale) EEs out there.
Bonus points: Lattice has turned a blind eye at the open source community, meaning Lattice's FPGAs / CPLDs have open-source toolsets. Kinda sad that "blind eye" is the best we can hope for from these companies, but that's how it is for now...
