Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | herghost's commentslogin

Ok, I give up.

How am I supposed to draw something?


Sorry about that, just upgraded the infra. Try reloading the page!


I might be missing something obvious but there only appears to be the option to draw something in predefined places - where the bubbles appear on the map.

I'm trying to mark up somewhere new that doesn't have a bubble and I can't see how I'm supposed to do that.


Right now it's limited to ~2,000 curated panorama locations. You can only draw at existing bubbles on the map. I'm working on expanding coverage, but if you have a spot or location you'd love to see added, let me know :)


hmmmmm...

2006, sat in a job interview. Interviewer says he'll Bluetooth over a file to me - what's by phone's name?

2006, the year that Tool's 10,000 Days had been released, which I was enjoying and, being a bit of an Edge Lord, I'd named my device after a lyric from Vicarious - which, IIRC fit perfectly into the name space and made me very happy:

> ILikeToWatchThingsDie

Excellent. Still got the job though!


the linked Github repo shares the name


As the default simulation played out beautifully on-load, I immediately started to question: "hang on, I thought there wasn't a solution for 3 bodies, but this looks stable".

Before I could complete the thought, it fell apart magnificently :)


The default configuration is a special case. They are all in a stable orbit around the common barycenter, always forming an equilateral triangle. We actually have closed form solutions for this kind of configuration.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem#General_sol...

PS: The site has more stable presets under load preset.


These are meta-stable, in that only a perfect initial state (positions and velocities) will be stable. Even then, I expect quantum uncertainties would kick in at some point. (In the simulator, the default system goes unstable at about 500 seconds, probably due to the limits of floating point math.)


>probably due to the limits of floating point math

It's due to the integration scheme (2nd order, albeit symplectic) and time step (5e-4, ok if better scheme is used).



We've recently come to this conclusion with our Cockapoo. His mother was a working Cocker Spaniel.

When the weather is poor we have often tried to get shorter walks in dry spells but augment it with as much ball time as possible to make sure he's getting enough exercise (since he generally dislikes bad weather).

It's become apparent that there's no possibility of satiety through chasing the ball though. He will simply go forever, however tired he looks.

I joked that as a Labrador will seemingly eat itself sick, a Spaniel will run itself lame.


For a breed that is partly bred to flush out game, throwing a ball is incredibly adrenaline inducing and will not tire them out - they’ll just keep going till they fall down. Working cockers are one of the breeds susceptible to exercise induced collapse, albeit rare it shows how insanely motivated they are.

To get them tired, you need to chill them out and have them use their brain and/or nose.

Maybe try some sniffing games, sit down during the walk and have them just take in the environment, do some obedience that makes them think, or throw their food in the grass and have them figure it out.


Isn't a better question: why would it matter?

Whichever is true, we all benefit, so why agitate over it? Conflating the two issues will not generate a single iota of good so drop it.


Mr Jenkinson will be here any minute now, chasing ambulances.


100% bullying.

Something that isn't seemingly being commented widely on either is that Vance started hitting Zelenskyy with bursts of multiple questions and as soon as he started answering the first there were immediate challenges and redirections.

English isn't Zelenskyy's first language. Imagine how tough this must have been.

At that point the questions weren't questions anymore - they were statements that were left unchallenged.


Vance just gets worse and worse every day, and so does certain SV circles’ infatuation with him. An absolute snake.


Vance works for a guy that he himself used to call Hitler. That tells you everything you need to know about Vance.


Yeah but that doesn’t rule him out in the struggle for succession. Because the VP can’t be primaried in 2026, he’s at the disadvantage that he won’t know if Musk will fund him; he’ll have to fundraise as the conventional pick.


Yup, it was a gish gallop with a dollop of DARVO.


> Something that isn't seemingly being commented widely on either is that Vance started hitting Zelenskyy with bursts of multiple questions and as soon as he started answering the first there were immediate challenges and redirections.

It's a (shitty) debate tactic called "gish galloping." It's not exclusively used by people on the right, but there are some very popular online personalities on the right who use it. Ben Shapiro is easily the most infamous for using it, but Jordan Peterson and Trump himself use it too.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop


> Europe's defence should not be entirely on the American tax payer

True. However.

The US has wanted to play a major role in Europe for 80 years because it meant they controlled the narrative. This, co-incidentally was favourable to European countries because they could spend their money elsewhere.

Over the past few years the US has decided that it would prefer to play in the Pacific rather than Europe and so has been edging away.

It's true that Western Europe has been slow to respond, but it's also important to acknowledge that Trump just changed the pace of this redirection and so it's not entirely on one or the other side.


Speaking as a worker this seems like a positive move.

Stepping outside that though - how is this going to impact the wider economy? The UK is in a tough spot. Partially self-inflicted, partially political, partially just the way things are now.

Will this improve things? Will it help or hinder?


Personally, I don’t see how it helps in their current political climate. Inflation and energy costs are a huge problem in the UK right now and that would lead to the assumption that people need to earn more. Going to a 4 day work week seems counter to the idea of earning more. Perhaps at the very high end (corporate management, etc) where companies can afford keep salaries the same without expecting more output, but at the low end of the workforce, there’s no way in hell that employers will pay employees for “unworked” days.

So some people might have an extra day off, but if they can’t pay their rent, it doesn’t really help anything. Those workers will pick up a 3rd or 4th job and nothing will change.

Unfortunate, but I think the UK has still a ways to sink before it comes to grips with the current reality and starts to climb out of it.


There is also aspect of having 1 extra day and no money to do anything meaningful with it.

UK wages are already poor and cost of living is insane.

Are you going to spend that day in your sorry mould ridden flat with other housemates also skint with nothing else to do?

Where do you even go? Shops are dead, public transport is unaffordable and state of it resembles soviet union near its collapse, entertainment, attractions out of reach. Sure there are some free things, but how many times you will go there before it is boring?

So I don't know, 4 days at main employer and 1 day doing Deliveroo? Selling weed? Only Fans?

You can tell UK is going downhill fast.


This is a bit dramatic, sure some people have to share a mouldy flat but most software engineers I know are doing ok


"doing ok" or "barely keeping head above water". Is not a good look, when you have people doing demanding engineering jobs that require skill and years of education, that they have to keep themselves up to date learning past 9-5. I know married senior developer with two kids, 20 years of experience, still saving for deposit for a flat (as house is now out of reach). Rents are going up and so the property prices so they can't catch up. His wife can't work full time, because of children and nursery etc is unaffordable. They have not been on holidays since Covid and employer is talking about downsizing. Man is 40 and looks like 50 due to stress. I know a couple of developers who are single, yes they do "okay", but they are nowhere near in a position to start a family. It's grim. Then you have wage compression where really doing warehouse job doesn't get you much worse living standard than typical developer. You will have shittier flat, maybe extra housemate and you will shop in Aldi instead of Waitrose. That's very much the difference right now.


> how is this going to impact the wider economy? The UK is in a tough spot. Partially self-inflicted

Well, take example from France, if you ever do. In 1936, the glorious Leon Blum signed the first national paid leave of the world (Congés Payés). We have literal photos of us going to the beach by train in 1936.

Meanwhile the Germans were working in factories for countless hours building bombs. Congés Payés cost us an alarming defeat. What a chance we were at the beach before those hard times.

(I confirm this comment is a tribute to all the English and US youths who had to save us from our sins).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: