I entered the topic of "going to war" and it did not return anything, but throughout history people have used the Bible as justification for going to war. And yet killing people is generally bad. Lots of nuances here but it seems like the system should have come up with something.
I'm all for doing it, the problem as-is is there are real downsides to something like Canine especially when it's super early like this. Posthog gets away with it because they aren't alpha (and have better humor, amongst other things).
Nice! I am currently writing a new version of my no-code platform, WeBase [1], to use AI to generate and edit applications.
Currently just using foundation models from OpenAI and Gemini but will be very interested to try this out.
My current approach is to just completely overwrite files with new updated version but I am guessing using something like Relace will make the whole process more efficient... is that correct?
I'll watch your video later but I would love to learn more about common use cases. It could even be fun to write a blog post for your blog comparing my "brut force" approach to something more intelligent using Relace.
> My current approach is to just completely overwrite files with new updated version
Overwriting full files work great <100 lines or so, but once you want to be able to edit files above that, it kind of gets very slow (and costly if using paid APIs), so using some sort of "patch format" makes a lot of sense.
This looks really nice. There is a pretty bad UX bug though... when I click export I can't see that anything happens. But if I scroll down I see there is a popup to export the chart. The popup really needs to be visible in the view pane so a user knows something is happening.
Yep. Just added Deepseek yesterday. The R1 model never returns output via the API so it is currently disabled, but you can access the V3 model even with the free version.
I built NimbleAI as a way to compare how different AI models work.
Currently it supports all of the usual suspects: o1, Gpt-4o, Claude 3.5, Llama 3.2 and Gemini 1.5. I also added support for Deepseek V3 recently (their R1 model seems down right now so it is not enabled).
The ultimate goal is to build agents that can leverage the best AI model for the job to complete more complex tasks, but to start I built a foundation for experimenting with multiple models.
You can also make chats or chat groups (comparisons) public. Here is an interesting one comparing Gpt-4o with Claude Sonnet 3.5:
This is nice! It looks like the pipeline is filling up! I signed up to launch NimbleAI [1] on your site.
One small issue with the launch date calendar. When I clicked a date in the calendar the popup with the actual launch date was always one day later. I wanted to launch on Tuesday, Jan 28, but when I picked that date it scheduled the launch for Wed, Jan 29.
BTW... what was the product you launched on PH that got buried??
Also... how funny would it be to launch ItsLaunched on PH and have it bubble to the top of PH! You should coordinate a launch on PH with all the users signed up for your new tool to get lots of votes. THAT would be awesome!
Cheers for adding up NimbleAI, I'm excited to see it launch.
I’ve had someone else mention the calendar issue too, but I haven’t been able to replicate it on my end, so I’m struggling to pinpoint the exact cause. If it’s not too much trouble, could you send me a screen recording or some details about the steps you took? That would really help me figure this out. (Send me a DM on twitter @lakshikagayal)
As for PH, I’ve launched not only one but several products there in the past, but since I don’t have a big community following me, they all ended up getting buried pretty quickly.
And launching this on PH and make it the #1? now that would be poetic, maybe we’ll make it happen someday :D
I had fun writing this. I really didn't like TailwindCSS when I first looked at it, but came to really like it after I worked with it enough to "get it".
I also love the basic ideas of this article but think the discussion on "micro-management" should be revised.
What about the idea of "Coaching Done Right" with some discussion of how to mold and encourage direct reports toward the path that leads to optimal growth for them?
The term micro-management is an inherently negative term. It connotes the idea of hovering over a person and trying to correct every detail of what they are doing "wrong". It takes away their agency and ability to learn from their mistakes.
Love the core idea of the article though! Thanks for sharing.
I would start by asking "What is my purpose in seeking to make a switch?"
Knowing your 'why' will help you know for sure if you are able to make the commitment required to make a switch. In general it will take a non-trivial amount of effort to make the change.
If you are confident that you genuinely want to move to the new field then it is all about learning and growing the skills required.
Get 1% better every day in that field and within a reasonable amount of time you'll have the proficiency to at least get entry level position.
