Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | gurjeet's commentslogin

Since the link shared here is for Triple N-Back method/app, for those looking for a standard Dual N-Back, there are many web apps, one such app I found in search results is https://dual-n-back.io/


Thank you for creating and sharing this utility.

I ran it over my Postgres development directories that have almost identical files. It saved me about 1.7GB.

The project doesn't have any license associated with it. If you don't mind, can you please license this project with a license of your choice.

As a gesture of thanks, I have attempted to improve the installation step slightly and have created this pull request: https://github.com/ttkb-oss/dedup/pull/6


Thanks for the PR. Individual files were licensed, but I’ve also added a LICENSE file as well.


So albertzeyer's script can be adapted to use `cp -c` command, to achieve the same effect as Hyperspace.


If you'd like. In the blog post he says he wrote the prototype in an afternoon. Hyperspace does try hard to preserve unique metadata as well as other protections.



Regular price for the non-TMobile customers is $20/mo.

From the linked page:

How much will it cost?

The beta is free for all. When T-Mobile Starlink launches in July, it will be included FREE on our best plan – Go5G Next – and available on other plans for $15/month.

Until March 1st, T-Mobile beta testers not on Go5G Next can secure an Early Adopter Discount of $5 off per month, reducing the monthly cost to just $10/month.

Verizon, AT&T and other customers can get T-Mobile Starlink without switching to T-Mobile for $20/month after the beta ends in July.


This seems to have been originally posted on Reddit, and the link posted there seems to be online, whereas this post's link seems to be now dead.

https://repo.aalto.fi/uncategorized/IO_926740c7-5165-439a-a0...

https://www.reddit.com/r/hackernews/comments/1i2pijr/nokias_...


It seems the other way around for the particular post you are linking.

This was posted to HN, then a bit picked it up from RSS and cross posted the same link to r/hackernews on Reddit (your Reddit link).

Then the repo.aalto.fi site was temporarily hugged by too much traffic.

Then someone reuploaded the PDF to this other tiiny site. Then the link on HN was changed to that. Then the file on the tiiny site disappeared.

Regardless, thanks for the link. The repo.aalto.fi link currently works for me. Probably because it’s getting much less traffic now.


Just for the record, I get the following message on all the pages, including the homepage:

Access Denied You don't have permission to access "http://www.homedepot.com/" on this server.

Reference #18.1d163e17.1733206920.39dbcb24

https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.1d163e17.1733206920.39dbcb24


> envoy overloaded

That's the plain-text message I see when I tried to refresh the stream.

Follow-up:

My location: East SF Bay.

Now even the Netflix frontpage (post login, https://www.netflix.com/browse ) shows the same message.

The same message even in a private window when trying to visit https://www.netflix.com/browse

The first round of the fight just finished, and the issues seem to be resolved, hopefully for good. All this to say what others have noted already, this experience does not evoke a lot of confidence in Netflix's live-streaming infrastructure.


Ah, envoy. Now that is a name I have not missed.


TL;DR from the fine article:

Summary

The idea that saturated fats cause heart disease, called the diet-heart hypothesis, was introduced in the 1950s, based on weak, associational evidence. Subsequent clinical trials attempting to substantiate this hypothesis could never establish a causal link. However, these clinical-trial data were largely ignored for decades, until journalists brought them to light about a decade ago. Subsequent reexaminations of this evidence by nutrition experts have now been published in >20 review papers, which have largely concluded that saturated fats have no effect on cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular mortality or total mortality. The current challenge is for this new consensus on saturated fats to be recognized by policy makers, who, in the United States, have shown marked resistance to the introduction of the new evidence. In the case of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines, experts have been found even to deny their own evidence. The global re-evaluation of saturated fats that has occurred over the past decade implies that caps on these fats are not warranted and should no longer be part of national dietary guidelines. Conflicts of interest and longstanding biases stand in the way of updating dietary policy to reflect the current evidence.


Can't tldr this article without including the author's name and reputation, and that many of the representations made are false. In particular, this statement is false:

> [nutrition experts] have largely concluded that saturated fats have no effect on cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular mortality or total mortality


The latest snapshot of the website may help:

https://web.archive.org/web/20241008203501/https://bullenweg...


Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: