_EVERY_ part of this reads like generated slop with no human check ,,every message and line ..
Site has random spacing, margin, padding in everywhere — looks awful. Many links not work. preview images are default or do not loading with reference to https://github.com/AntonOsika/gpt-engineer in places
It’s not just bad — it’s broken.
Example images from companies that do not use your service’s with stolen logos. Unreadable text. Random letters.
It’s not just slop spam — it’s slop spam that a human never bothered to even look at before using it for your home page launch.
Its not for authenticity but instead to prevent tampering of adblock,ad and tracking removals more if there is history in search many complains in this
If they run in one dev env, (for cost reasons), it is preferably in Docker is VERY expensive if you are not using it for personal, noncommercial usage now ...
VDI VM in VM often not ideal aswell,
Docker is paid per seat monthly subscription for commercial usages
Is there any way to tell if the SMART has been reset/tampered with in any way? If you have a drive that claims to have 0 hours of use, but it quickly starts to rack up failure indicators… how can you tell if it’s spurious failures or a fraudulent tampered drive?
Seagate has a proprietary version of SMART called FARM. It’s supposed to be more tamper resistant than SMART, but it appears the fraudsters have figured out how to manipulate it too [1].
The best you can do is check FARM if available and perform a long burn-in with something like badblocks. Then compare the SMART data before and after the burn in. Checking the serial number against the manufacturers database if available is also a good precaution.
These are probably things you should be doing whether or not the drive is allegedly new.
What specifically draws you to Sentry over self-hosting or smaller players? Would an indie-hosted alternative (with similar privacy guarantees but more personalized support) appeal more?
I'd probably pay the fee, take my flight, then charge it back with a reason like "Fee for not using app, app did not work. Fee advertised as optional was not, in fact, optional for me". Completely true statement.
I don't know about Ryanair, but I've had to reverse credit card transactions due to scams a few times and I've never been banned from other businesses.
I have try it a few times in Copilot as code fast 1 because it was advertised. It has never correctly done something so far. Maybe because it's the fast ver ?
Maybe you just used it wrong? I refactored a complicated code base, built exhaustive tests for a CLI app and I've been maintaining and building out several k8s clusters out of a mono repo using Cline + grok-code-fast-1 and it's been a breeze.
The numbers and amounts used for account validations and adding it to be able to pull or push money . Should not be shown public..