bruh,why not just post the prompt. no one wants to read this slop

Ya sorry brother, I guess I could have but thought people might find some other gems in there if they're running into any trouble

Directionally correct is the other kind of emdash.

It's my understanding that they predate llms, and internet snivel.

Yeah, going to have to go ahead and disagree with you there boss. The man Hegseth in all his 'no quarter' bravado is only affirming his own mother's claim that he is a piece of shit. respectfully of course, I would not put it past him to kill some kids for a political or terrorism reason (the parents).

Also, it's been a while but remember Trump literally said he wanted to "take out the families" of terrorists (https://www.cnn.com/2015/12/02/politics/donald-trump-terrori...).

Obama and Bush both regularly bombed weddings where a single target was present.

It's a non-sequitur point anyway, these kids weren't families of terrorists.

The terrorist is Hegseth and co.

He is a full time nauseating AI shill. If you happen to listen to his recent appearance on Software Engineering Radio podcast, you may just die of cringe. I had my final straw moment on AI hype during that podcast and my first I wish someone would bully that nerd moment.

congrats for.. selling out? wut

they have bad taste obviously otherwise we'd all be using their project

Yes, when the poetry people purposely added a feature to fail CI with a 1/10 chance because they wanted to depreciate a feature, I depreciated poetry.

link it if you have a good source smh

This reminds me of Amazon Prime video advertising Molly Mae. It knows I would never ever watch that trash but it shows it to me precisely for that reason, that'll I get annoyed enough to vent about it and contribute to it going viral. It works i guess, since I am typing this garbage on hn.

>Saying that uv is their only winner is a hilarious take.

na this news is good enough reason to move from Ruff back to black and stay the course, I won't use anything else from Astral. I will use uv but only until pip 2/++ gets its shit together and catches up and hopefully then as a community we should jump back on board and keep using pip even if it's not as good, it's free in the freedom sense.

I mean you don't need to use that then. `uv` is still writing to `.venv` by default and you can activate it with `direnv` or w/e.

the point about defaults though, the default or defacto workflow is uv run

Maybe, but that's not how I've been holding it.

I think I have trauma from virtual environments...