Thanks for the feedback. I was trying to make that clear with "grep reference", but you're right, it's still ambiguous. I'll add a note to clear it up. Both "wc" and "grep" don't solve the problem, they're just comparisons to see how fast other programs can read the input (and in wc's case, tokenize into words). For grep, I'm using "grep foobar".
Looks great and really uncomplicated. The demo works flawlessly, including receiving email attachments. Good job!
Love the readability and content of the license terms as well. In particular the parts on software modifications.
One feature that is a show-stopper for our workflow is the possibility of shared drafts, i.e. where an email response can be prepared and stored by one person and later reviewed, perhaps completed, and sent by someone else. Do you think this is something that you might consider adding in the foreseeable future?
The license is based on DuetApp's (https://duetapp.com/) version. I liked its simplicity and asked the creator if it would be OK with him to use his license as a starting point.
Shared drafts sound like an interesting feature and one that seems easy to implement on Full Help. I've added it to my Trello board. Thanks!
I found this to be the only working solution to manage a todo list, where manual scheduling became cumbersome and error prone (often > 50 todos, all of which "asap", but with a wide variety of deadlines (2 days to 3 months) and with very different effort levels between 10 minutes and 10 hours involved). At this level it becomes difficult to give reliable estimates to clients and detect bottlenecks when needing to re-schedule on new and urgent tasks or meetings.
I have tested taskjuggler, but it fails to schedule tasks when a mixture of with/without deadline (end) tasks is provided.
Other todo apps/software do not even try, but only show me the seemingly unsurmountable heap of todos before me with convergent deadlines and no proposed solution.
Only downside though (for me) is, there does not seem to be a (paid) self-hosted (privacy aware) version available.
For me, rspamd with corresponding exim-acls practically solved that issue since 02/2016. Spam is mostly rejected, otherwise tagged (and filtered with dovecot-sieve downstream into a review-box) or - if borderline - greylisted. Have had no false positives I'm aware of and only 1-2 false negatives per week slip through that cascade.
edit: Although some training (i.e. manually moving spam to IMAP-Junk) was necessary during the first few months.
While only working in 1D (up/down for workspaceswitch; left/right for monitor switch), I use a similar "geometric navigation" from within i3 in place of the Meta+Number default shortcuts.
Have you considered Zim (http://zim-wiki.org)?
It seems to check all of your points.
I'm using it heavily for all kind of notes that exceed two lines. It has some amazing plugins too (e.g. For organizing Todo items across the entire notebook).
>>> But then the "appropriate limits" are part of your theory.
That's certainly true. I'm not active in that field, but a couple of examples of appropriate limits are where classical mechanics is an appropriate limit of both quantum mechanics and special relativity. It only says that if your theory profoundly disagrees with existing observation, try again. At an even simpler level, the approximately parabolic arc of a stone thrown in the air is an appropriate limit of Newton's mechanics.
But the hope is to create a theory where some other limit can also be found -- such a limit might be an unexpected new particle, astronomical observation, etc.
[1] https://github.com/benhoyt/countwords/blob/eb2a8adf21c895907...