Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | flakeoil's commentslogin

Maybe not to install, but to chose what to install. Saying "install Debian instead of Ubuntu" is not a complete answer, because you have to select a window manager as well. If you go "pure" Debian, what should you then select? GNOME, KDE, cinnamon, xfce, Mate...?

It's an easier path to go with Linux Mint or Ubuntu. Less overwhelming choices when you just want to get started. Linux Mint is good for people used to Windows as it feels familiar. If you still want to go "pure" Debian you can use LMDE (Linux Mint Debian Edition).


Just go with the XFCE ISO and say you want to have non-free stuff, choose your locale and say yes to the partition plan, and you're done in like twenty minutes unless your storage is very slow.

Thanks. Well, in that case I would for sure select KDE Plasma over XFCE as it feels more modern from a design point of view and for someone coming from Windows or MacOS they would probably feel more at home.

Good point, but is Google Docs more compatible with MS Office than Libre Office? Can one work fricitonless between a Google Docs user and an MS Word user?

There is also OnlyOffice as an alternative to Google Docs. https://www.onlyoffice.com/download-desktop


They can not, as Nvidia owns very little of its own stock.

It's the owners of the Nvidia stock who potentially could trade their Nvidia stocks for the other 230 companies stocks. But then they have no Nvidia stocks anymore, on the other hand.


The water temperature which you deliver to radiators are not defined by capacity of the heatpump, but how hot the radiators can be for safety/comfort reasons. If the radiators are too hot people could burn by touching them or stuff like platsic chairs would melt. Also the piping in the walls and floors cannot support too hot temperatures.

The temp for water used in radiators 60-70C is easily achievable by an air-top-water heat pump. It does not depend on the energy source, gas/oil/electricity.


The heat pump runs with much better efficiency at <50 degrees.


Condensing gas boilers similarly run more efficiently at lower temps.

If the water returning to the boiler isn't below 54C then there will be no condensing at all, and the advertised 90%+ efficiency won't happen till the return value is more like 46C.

That translates roughly to max winter temp of 65C leaving the boiler and lower when lesss heating is required.

This can be tweaked by the end user and save 10-20% on heating bills.


Yes, and US bad at everything else.


The US economy is one of the world's most diverse in terms of exports:

https://oec.world/en/visualize/tree_map/hs92/export/usa/all/...

Side note: Why is there so much fact-free anti-US sentiment on HN?


> Side note: Why is there so much fact-free anti-US sentiment on HN?

Look at basically any domain: whoever's in the lead, gets the most hate.

The US has the world's biggest economy and military, the most cultural power, the biggest tech industry, etc. The hate is inevitable. That's not to say that the US doesn't have plenty of very real problems -- obviously it does -- but it's just easier to dunk on the leader, which also means more empty, vacuous criticism.


> Why is there so much fact-free anti-US sentiment on HN?

Firstly, it's the US government themselves saying there are imbalances and therefore they have to add tariffs on imports from almost every country. It's the US government who spreads hate towards most other countries, not the other way around.

Secondly, could it be because people living in the US seem to not notice (or don't want to believe) the US is turning into a dictatorship and the rest of the world does. People don't like the new values of the USA, they liked the old values. If it continues like this, it's game over for the USA.


Orange man bad


I'd say it is more because "Orange man says we are bad at X, but only he can make X great again™".

People start believing we can't do anything at all.


Yes, he is orange and bad. Glad we agree.


I mean he is. But people don't want facts


The US has super successful music and movie industries, puts out a lot of fossil fuels, hugely successful finance sector, and has the world's most powerful military. Really, the US has plenty of strengths to go along with its weaknesses.


The keyboard issue when switching from Windows/Linux to Mac is understated. It's a pain and I think it's worse for non-english keyboards/characters. You have to use plugins/3rd party software and relearn new keys.


Or forward your gmail to another proper email domain.


I just can't live without the Gmail spamfilter. It's just the best. Industry-leading; no question.


Gmail regularly lets through spam, including backscatter spam from mail sent to the google.com domain spoofing Gmail users. Industry-leading is not the term I would use to describe their spam heuristics.

Grey listing has been far more effective at stopping spam than some half-baked AI garbage from Google.


Not ideal - can't disagree. Still, it's the industry leader. I'm not aware of a better spamfilter.

Grey listing doesn't scale; not for me.


I forward everything including spam to Fastmail. Their spam filter is absolutely fine. This way I don't need to check for false positives in 2 places. You're probably losing one genuine message a year if you don't check your Gmail spam folder.


Hmm. Not really. I run greylisting on my personal domain which is extremely low traffic and lately I'm getting like 4-5 spams per day that obey it correctly.

Which is more than the non spam emails that come on it :)


I control spam by using email aliases. And it makes it easy to track exactly who leaked/sold my email address. But I don't use gmail, as I value my privacy.


I do aliases as well. Never enough. A battle-tested spammer would run s/+[^@]*// on the address before sending.


I have my own domain and just do <website-name>@mydomain.com and redirect everything to the same inbox sorted in folders.

Works pretty well, if any of those addresses gets into some spam list I just block it (hasn't happened yet, though)


Catch-all (*) setup is the best, until a spammer hits a gibberish localpart (on purpose) and your domain cheerfully accepts it.

Don't get me wrong, I use catch-all too (don't tell spammers).


I whitelist using regular expressions (specific prefixes mostly). Gibberish and random localparts are unlikely to match those, it effectively never happens.


Using passmail aliases through protonmail has worked well for me, that way my domain isn't exposed. And everything forwards to one inbox.


Subaddressing != aliasing.


Aliasing !== masked email


Agreed, there are also ways to employ aliases which won't prevent spam, but this still doesn't explain the relation to the subaddressing regex or why other ways or employing aliases (e.g. masking) are never enough.


That's what I thought too until I moved to Fastmail. It certainly isn't worse.


Fastmail is great. It's just that I'm not willing to pay 5$ each month to send 5 emails from @mydomain.com. 1$ per email is too much, right?


I have all of my mail (and all of my domains) there, that makes it a fair deal. It also fetches from gmail and other places.


It is at least 5 months since spammers use fake "delivery error" to skip the filter: http://old.reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/1jzf6o2/fake_... . I would expect more from industry-leading company.

Just joking, I expect nothing from GMail team after I noticed that "block sender" option just puts emails in spam folder instead of deleting them on arrival.


I just can't live without the Gmail spamfilter. It's just the best. Industry-leading; no question.

I have accounts on Gmail and other services, and can say from close to a decade of use that Fastmail's spam filter is usually far better than Gmail's.

Occasionally it'll fall behind for a few weeks, but always seems to catch up or surpass Google's.

Over the last couple of months, for example, 100% of the spam I've received has come from Gmail. 0% from Fastmail.


Have you tried other things? And not saying just Microsoft.


Proton Mail is good (just not as good), but you can't integrate external SMTP for outbound emails; you have to pay to send from @yourdomain.com.

With Gmail, you can configure an external SMTP server using "Send mail as" setting. Super convenient. Tons of mail services offer a generous free tier for personal use (e.g., Mailgun 100 emails/day).

It's not really worth paying just to send a few personal emails from @yourdomain.com each month.


This comment is from 1020.


LOL. Thanks.


Gmail is absolutely terrible for false positives. I'm sure they do it deliberately to discourage people from using other e-mail services.


What's your setup? If you're forwarding, an SPF-only aligned email will fail DMARC, and it's the sender's fault: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45441243

Next time a legit email ends up in your spam folder, use this tool to figure out why: https://mxtoolbox.com/EmailHeaders.aspx

I've had a few cases myself, and it's always been the sender's fault.


Yes, they do. But you'll get 5 responses saying you're doing something wrong.


The article does not discuss what to use instead of Microsoft's products, it discusses a better architecture for authorization than the one Microsoft uses. The architecture which Microsoft uses is flawed and too many companies rely on it.

The solution in short: "...distributed in the form a key who’s pieces live across a decentralized network."

If looking for alternatives to Microsoft's products I would recommend Infomaniak [0]. They have a fairly complete solution of business tools (email, contacts, calendar, cloud storage, file sharing, chat, video meetings, docs and sheets).

[0] https://www.infomaniak.com


While your comment makes sense if you were commenting on an Apple or Samsung phone, but this is a Linux phone. We should be glad there are Linux phones being made available at all and the smallest problem is if there is a camera bump or not.

I hope one day comes when the biggest issue with a Linux phone is a camera bump or some other mechanical detail.


I agree. I think the reason why Rails (and Laravel) set the default to SQLite is that it makes it easier for newcomers to start. No install needed of MySQL/Postgres.

The problem with making this the default is that people then think it is the recommended way, even if it is not. It is the easiest way to fast get something up and running locally, but it is typically not the best for a production setup. Experienced users will know this, but for beginners to these frameworks, it leads them in the wrong direction.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: