Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | eunos's commentslogin

Not an American, what made Flock special compared to other surveillance cameras? Informationized or intelligentized surveillances cameras arent a new thing.

Mass deployment on public property and the network effect that having them all connected and using things like license plate readers is all pretty new.

Largely the US hasn’t had widespread surveillance, it’s been private property ownership of CCTV type systems for security reasons which Americans are ok with. Reading my license plate, face, gait, etc every 100 meters as I move across a large distance loses the security reason and entered the world of mass surveillance. Which while many of us struggle with caring about, is seen as infringing on our right to privacy which itself has a complex legal interpretation of and where systems like this cross a line into what is acceptable. The fact that law enforcement can query flock to learn of an individual’s location without any warrant is often seen as directly opposing a constitutional protection from government search. It might also be important to know that the US Constitution is seen as a law of physics in some areas and that most laymen that read the Fourth Amendment would come to the conclusion that this is not allowed and thus unconstitutional at its core. There’s of course legal things that have happened since that clarify interpretation of the constitution so the wiggle room they have to operate, especially when it’s something the government wants to exists, is enough for now. The Supreme Court would be the ones to eliminate grey area. They recently issued a ruling taking a heavier privacy stance. Meanwhile, people on the street have grown deep distrust in tech and government which is visible as they are destroying these cameras.


The fact that they allow unlimited access to any law enforcement organization, where they can surveil anyone across the entire country. Police have used it to stalk ex-partners, for example. The number of cameras are also an order of magnitude higher. I can't leave my driveway without being tracked.

2000's supercomputer is today's (highest end) smartphone performance tho

Yeah. And if you compare the AI you can run on a high end smart phone today to AI of the 2000s, today's smart phone probably wins.

In 10 or 20 years maybe we'll all be running AI models that are currently considered "frontier" on smart phone type devices.


China is predictable. See how it was smoother during Du30


The imperial hubris need to be humbled sometime


Yes agreed that is how the world turns but given the state of world I don't see it happening in any of our lifetimes.


China should increase the import pace especially after the US strategic reserve depleted. Considering that despite Chinese saving, US and EU are more interested doing another trade war.


Isnt that the idea from gemini cli?


They dont want dollars that could be used to grow US frontier labs to fund Chinese instead


Surprised that Mitch outlived him. RIP.


Lindsey Graham just spoke to Mitch McConnell for 20 minutes.


You're being downvoted, but that was funny.


I wonder if his wake will be open closet?


Yeah, I really don’t think Mitch did.


> Mitch outlived him.

We can't be certain of that.


Always in threes...


I hate the word democratizing


> Rather than narrow and specific - it's a broad based law

Because narrow law is easier to avoid or find the loophole and a single case is enough to induce panic and anger.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: