The cool thing about humanity is it’s almost always someone’s first time.

How does this work?

Not OP, but I think they want the software to be FLOSS, but if you want some feature/change you pay (the maintainers) to have it done.

Yep, as well as charging for support and consulting. Anything that has to do with developers'/maintainers' time should not be expected to come for free in FOSS projects. Unless the devs are happy to do such work for free ofc.

Why is it an editor? Often times I want to fact check other things, not my own writing.

OP here, it is an editor because our first market segment is content creators. A browser plugin is on the way!

Or rather, if you're actually writing, you probably already have sources in mind. Some people probably are willing to write stuff before they know whether it's true or false (astrologists, fiction authors), but who among those writers cares to fact check whatever they just put down?

There’s a grease monkey script that will block the call. It’s happening in your browser after text completion.

Actually it's also got a flag to moderate on the conversation endpoint as well now, I found a fix for it for the CGPT-demod script you're talking about; just setting the flag false, lmao.

But realistically they could mod forcibly on their end if they really wanted to, only issue is API use may run into issues where a legitimate use ends up getting stomped by moderation.

That's why it's honestly just better for them to make moderation optional, they should have a button for it in CGPT interface just as Google has "safesearch on/off".

Because of the way it works they can fundamentally not prevent it from producing explicit, violent or adversarial output when someone is focussed on getting it to do so without removing the very magic that makes it so good for everything else. So they should stop trying already, like damn.

Really? Why would they fire that off from the client as a separate call? Thanks for the heads’ up, will check out.

Perhaps because they don't want to actually block you from doing this, but want to have the plausible deniability that they put measures in place?

(And 'they' here might mean the company as an abstract entity, or perhaps just the engineer put in charge of implementing this feature?)

Validates output at time of rendering, so you can't trick it with obfuscation techniques.

There's a browser plugin called DeMod or something that disables it but I don't know how well it works.

Same here. Instead, I get to pay for ChatGPT and have people tell me it’s inferior.

How does this make sense? Memorizing and then reciting copyrighted works is still infringement in a lot of commercial contexts.

The reciting part is illegal, but as long as it is trained not to recite things in full (or to whatever limit the law determines), then it should be fine.

Try publishing Harry Potter but changing all the proper nouns and use synonyms for all the adjectives.

It's gonna be copyright infringement.

You can even cut a few scenes and make up a few scenes entirely, too. You're still getting busted.

Yes, that’s why I am saying they will have to ensure the LLM doesn’t do that.

reciting is violation of copyright

creatively transform and apply for some tasks maybe not violation

Definitely isn’t. You don’t have to go that far back to find that obesity was considered ideal.

Beauty is generally more socially constructed then biological.

Opiates only help so much, unless you’re talking about using them to overdose.

Assuredly he is

Not everyone’s experience of pain is the same. We should keep that in mind and have empathy.

exactly. the alcohol is usually just secondary and self-medication to deal with pain and that pain is very individual and personal.

They didn’t practically, they did. There was a specific exchange between Sam and members of the hearing in which a sitting US Senator asked him if he wanted the job. Sam replied no, he likes his job, but suggested they could recommend people. The Senator appeared happy with this.