Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | e-clinton's commentslogin

So… no punishment for past indiscretions, only barriers to protect against future ones? Got it.


What you’re doing is coming…Microsoft is already working on this problem—the issue is trust. I only see this working as an open source initiative where people can inspect the code, run their own servers and provide their own keys. Maybe do open core in which you upsell certain reports or other features.


Top website is a porn site, and site 2 and 3 don’t load.


In this instance, quantity isn’t as important. The people it upsets are a loud bunch of a great deal of influence.


They don't. There was a similar uproar when Apple forced developers to share their addresses on AppStore publicly in EU.


You’re implying that if someone uses AI to write something, the person doesn’t then read it/iterate on it to ensure correctness. Serious “get off my lawn” vibes here.


the person doesn’t then read it/iterate on it to ensure correctness.

As someone who has had to deal with drive-by PRs on open-source projects, which were a problem before but have now gotten much worse in volume as they are mostly AI-generated, yes.


A journalist digging for details before writing a story is what one expects. The real question is how reputable is this journalist and outlet? What's the risk here? That they'll quit their job and go copy your thing instead? If answering that question puts your company at risk, then the issue may be the level of value you provide on top of whatever tools/frameworks you used.


“Analyzes email as you read them”

I have 108k unread emails on Gmail. “Analysis” as I read them isn’t my pain-point. Surfacing the 2-3 important emails I get daily so that I don’t miss something important among all the noise is really all I want from AI.

Everyone is focused on helping me write emails or summarize emails; things I frankly do not care about.

That said, I like the idea of a copilot for the browser, it just requires a great deal of trust in your company since I’m giving you access to my entire life.


I just did this with Immich. I have 2TB of photos in it and I backup my phone automatically. Using cloudflare tunnels to access remotely.


same. super convenient to be able to go to photos.[domain].com for my photos. the immich android app is great too.

cloudflare tunnels is a game changer, I can't believe it's free.


> same. super convenient to be able to go to photos.[domain].com for my photos. the immich android app is great too. > > cloudflare tunnels is a game changer, I can't believe it's free.

Could you explain cloudflare tunnels are secure. I understand not punching holes through one's firewall and dealing with a residential connection that's often targeted for exploits. However, if one targets the tunnel endpoint to exploit is it more secure even though it's still exposed to the public?


Secure how? You're exposing a port to the Internet, the tunnel doesn't make it more or less secure. If you don't trust the service, don't expose it.


Check out pangolin. You can get all the awesome of cloudflare tunnela without having your traffic sold to dat aggregators. Jims garge on youtube just did a decent video on it.


Interesting idea, but I’d take it a step further. I want to control exactly what videos the kids can watch, not just the channel.


Minitube is pretty great, and uses MPV (and therefore yt-dlp) behind the scenes. It has filters that are really neat, and is very minimalistic.

I personally use it, too, to avoid distracting myself and to actively search for everything I consume.

[1] https://flavio.tordini.org/minitube


Does it have parental controls, or a way of at least seeing what the kids are watching? I can't tell from looking at that page.


the idea is that you trust the channel that you add. so assuming every video on that channel is safe....


I added the ability to exclude shorts. Is it wrong to assume if the channel is ok, that all videos within the channel are ok?


yt-dlp + Plex


Patricia Arquette’s car was most disorienting to me. This woman was a high level manager/exec at a very successful company, surely she can afford more than a rabbit.


Don't know if you're caught up with the new season, so, spoilers, she's not a high level exec.


it's not clear where Severance takes place exactly. But it is wintery and has universities and decrepit fishing towns. So if it's supposed to be New England, i think this makes sense. There are a lot of very successful people in New England who drive old VWs and Subarus.


The office building is a Bell Labs building in Holmdel. The aesthetic of the town feels a bit like upstate New York. But the town of Salt Neck (200m away) was filmed in Newfoundland. So they are going for permanently cold and remote but with familiar elements.

But the cars are not normal for any of those places in the modern era where people own smartphones (as the characters do.) In fact, my parents used to own Ms. Cobel’d exact VW Rabbit in 1983 (in silver) and it was not a great car for snow. They replaced it with multiple successive 4WD Subarus as soon as that was an option. The RWD Volvos are better and kind of timeless New England cars, but I’d imagine those year/models have passed into rust by now except for a few that were exquisitely pampered and kept away from road salt.


My wife and I comment on it regularly. Neither of us have noticed a remotely modern car. They even show full parking lots at some point(s) iirc.

It’s as striking of a design choice as it is perplexing hah.


If I remember correctly, some documents that appear in season 1 have addresses that say "Kier, PA"


Kier, PE actually.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: