Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dschndstryr's commentslogin

It's humor. Everything else looks kinda real. The science is bad though, because it lacks all details needed to reproduce and the evaluation is a bit fishy. They also claim it's super fast without mentioning what makes their approach fast.


No one else seems to realize that.


If you're just a code monkey this comparison would be correct.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: