Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dosisking's commentslogin

The TOS computer was better, it had a better computer-like voice.

You should check out all of the voices available on macOS. They still have the original, robotic sounding MacinTalk voices from 1984, such as Fred. They’re fun to play with.

Personally, I think Majel Barrett is my favorite computer voice of all time.


The US already depleted its missile stockpile, these missiles cannot be replaced because the US needs Rare Earths. China doesn't have to wait, the US defeated itself already

> I think what you are missing is that it will dramatically lower the cost of living so that everyone’s standard of living increases. It’s not about jobs

This is flat out wrong. The problem is excessive taxation and government spending beyond its means that lowers everyone's standard of living.


Not always that you see two wildly wrong claims made in ostensible opposition to each other

> And yeah: stop. using. X11. For God's sake!

Why should I stop using software that is superior to the alternatives?


It isn't though. For example, the very article we are discussing.

Last time I looked they had broken copy/paste behaviour which dates back decades

If said copy paste behavior allows any app to snoop on any other apps' clipboard content without control, then it's been broken for decades.

Sounds similar to Rust programmers

Not necessarily, it just guarantees that China will win.

Unclear.

How much is China learning from open models? Or the other way around, how much is the US losing worldwide mindshare by refusing to allow non-Americans access to bleeding-edge models and letting China fill in the gap? (Playing catchup with Mythos is still catching up, etc.)


> How much is China learning from open models?

The last batch of open weight models releases by Chinese companies are on par with the performance of US-based frontier models, even though they are designed to run on pretty unimpressive hardware.


This is very misleading. There is no Chinese model currently that is on par with Fable or Astra. Kimi K3 is pretty good, but it's not that good.

Furthermore the Chinese models in that class are appropriately large. K3, for example, is a 2.8T-parameter model. Qwen 3.8 Max, another comparable model, is 2.4T params. Even with MoE, these are not "designed to run on pretty unimpressive hardware". Stuff like Qwen3.7-27B is, but it is also not even in the same ballpark as Opus, never mind frontier.


> How much is China learning from open models?

Across all their labs? Probably more than OpenAI and Anthropic learned from Astra/Mythos combined. The American frontier is being driven by an abundance of compute, which doesn't seem to scale efficiently.

> how much is the US losing worldwide mindshare

They're losing US mindshare. I pay $3/month for a Z.AI subscription and get billions of Opencode tokens. The $20/month price point is insane for the way that Claude and Codex treat their users, and that money doesn't go towards anything good like open-sourcing their models. It's a doomed product.


The alternative is Sam Altman winning.

which would be better

Sounds like a classic case of Repetitive Stress Injury. You could try balancing it out by using your left thumb to scroll through articles about Artificial Stupidity.

> True optimal what? Optimal intelligence? What would that be?

Elon Musk, obviously


Instead of FM, maybe they can just use an AY-3-8910?

> Sir, I’m 40 and I’m already at the stage of not wanting to do any programming.

It's a shame you didn't come to this conclusion 10 years ago!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: