Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dhkxh's commentslogin

The more recent but quaint days of desktop programs where clicking on [x] would actually close the program.


You can be selective about your work without being a snob.


Not in my experience as a software developer.


Related question - how many bookmarks do you have and how do you use them? Because for my use I don't see a point of doing anything fancier that Ctrl-D to bookmark and keeping them in <5 folders in my browser.


I am archiving many links in my desktop browser (about 50 folders with various subfolders and each with a dozen links). The problem is that I would also like to have them available on mobile devices. Sure, most of the time you will not need them again. But with increasing regularity I am remembering that I was reading something interesting somewhere and want to have a look again, but can't find it in the web anymore. Then, you can figure out more easily where you read it when having appropriate and well-structured bookmarks.


Do you have an opinion on life in Germany that you would like to share?


This list is so ridiculous that I can't bring myself to do a point-by-point rebuttal.


That's not how open source works.


The license can change any time they want. They can change the license to prevent certain companies from using future releases and/or security patches.

Let's don't forget the fact that Huawei had legally binding contracts with all those US suppliers.


> The license can change any time they want. They can change the license to prevent certain companies from using future releases and/or security patches.

Until then, it's a bsd inspired license. And you get code from Cox, Griesmer, Taylor, Pike, Hudson and Clements under those terms. It's a big team on several aspects.

So you can remove your tinfoil hat and check the code for yourself. It is valuable.


So? Just fork the last freely-licensed Version then.


then start to use clean room process to reimplement all future bug fixes? nice!


Where comes the expectation from, that someone else fixes your problems for free? If you clone Go now, you get a robust codebase for free, and you could do any maintenance on your own (as a reasonably large organization)


This reminds me of Hello Internet recently releasing a special 2-minute episode of their podcast on a wax cylinder - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonograph_cylinder

Really difficult to get your hands on one but it's possible. And the peak of their popularity was about 100 years ago.


Your title is about inferences, but your text describes a summary, a descriptive statistic or an aggregation - they are very different problems. It's quite straightforward to "find a top item" regardless of the dataset but I don't know why you would want this automated at all.


1. Review your mistakes after each game - lichess.org (which is the best online chess platform by far) has an option to look at your sub-optimal moves at the end of a game and find a better move than the one you made originally.

2. Obligatory shoutout to ChessNetwork who has a great youtube channel - the guy is just a pleasure to listen to and his beginner series, which teach important general concepts, will be really useful if you've plateaued around 1000.


+1 for chessnetwork. Somehow this guy can provide live commentary on GM vs GM bullet games. It feels like you’re watching a tennis match and he’s providing comments on every stroke.


I agree with these 2 points especially Jerry being easy listening. His commentary on one minute lightning chess tourneys on lichess is phenomenal esp. when Dr. Carlsen is at large.


There is no good reason to ever use Alteryx over R/Python. But their company is really good at selling to non-technical management.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: