Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dermacentor's commentslogin

In the long term.

Fair enough - it will take some time before the science comes back.

But I feel the need to point out - the goalposts for "does AI work" shift daily.


It's not that deep.

Never.

It's glass, dude. There's not gonna be a crease.

at what temperatures must it be kept to be foldable like this?

Room temperature. Most foldables have a real glass layer (not the top layer though) which somehow bends.

Glass is bendable at room temperature if you make it thin enough.

Case in point: fiber optics.

Thousands of Kelvin.

Plastic glass?

Why are they on X? As a European company, should they not be posting instead from W Social?

What's W social?

Nobody is stopping you from bolting on a modified Casio watch.


Nobody is stopping you from forking Asahi and making your own version with cocaine, hookers and AI.


I was thinking of doing it. I've a good model to use for reverse engeniring, good logical skills, what's missing is apple's hardware


You're not paying $1,000 for a cut down Android when you buy a Comma Four.

What you're buying is an entry ticket to Comma-land — where dozens of car models are supported, pre-made harnesses are just a buy button away, and everything is open source.

If George had chosen to go the closed source route, you might be paying $200 for a locked-down device and $200 every month for a mandatory subscription.

Which one makes you feel better? Comma as a business needs to be able to pay their employees.


I want them to improve the product meaningfully beyond lane keeping, which besides lane changing (partially), it's the only thing it's capable of because they willingly choose not to extend the system to use more visibility.


What is "more visibility"?


Comma-land?

Comma on, man.


Where is your proof?

They have thermal sensors on their forearms and are known to climb trees. Why wouldn't they approach from above?



Could you share the paper where every tick species was tested over a decade and none of them ever climbed up a tree and fell down on prey?


Ticks climb low vegetation (not just grass) and wait for a host to pass by ("questing").

If you're going to disagree with basic textbook biology knowledge, the burden of proof is on you.


Humans walk to Burger King (not just McDonalds), provide payment, and wait for a cashier to provide them a hamburger. Everyone knows humans aren't capable of "hunting" with a "bow and arrow."

You are taking the official, "please don't panic" story from CDC and trying to force it down everyone's throats while claiming it's as basic a fact of biology as chromosomes and the mitochondria. It's not. This is a contested area of animal behavior, not a microscopic process.

Are you persistent in being dense because you want somebody to engage with and correct you, or are you genuinely trying to get people infected?


Ticks don't exclusively hunt via questing. Some will actively pursue hosts if needed. The lone star tick is especially known for this: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/3/478

> In contrast to D. variabilis, A. americanum is regarded as a hunter tick, which will walk/crawl rapidly across many meters when attracted by host odors. This behavior enhances its host range since these ticks do not have to wait for a passing host.


What, you mean the thing Microsoft did to IBM with DOS? Say it isn't so!


... DOS or OS/2? lol

I do suppose there are some analogies to be had if we talk about OS/2...

i.e. that was supposed to be more of a partnership versus a normal vendor agreement...

However my understanding is that there was a lot more org cultural friction; A big one being IBM's insistence on early versions of OS/2 supporting the 286 (as well as similar rigid bureaucratic support requirements) on top of the way IBM did 'Process Management' on developers as far as using LOC to measure productivity.

While I am a huge proponent of .NET, I'm not the biggest fan of Microsoft...

But I've also worked at orgs that have run the gamut between 'too conservative' and 'a little bold/reckless' in engineering practices. Microsoft was able to iterate way faster and decided to tackle backward compatibility in different ways. They got tired of the bureaucracy of IBM, and I'll use Raymond Chen's story of a coffee maker to example the type of bureaucracy and how ironically simple it was to avoid; https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20220426-00/?p=10...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: