*taking* $12 from every person in the US... But I still think it's worth it.

Hate to admit it... but the video goes hard

Somehow the one feature I need to use is the one feature broken on the website... every time.

Very unreasonable to use the amount purchased last year as the only amount they could ever get in a fiscal year

I rewrote the article, it's even better now:

The tomahawk entered service in 1983, in 2026 they only produced 57. DO THE MATH!

This means the military can only have (2025-1983) * 57 = 2394 Tomahawks.

But the military says they have approximately 3000-4000 tomahawks in inventory. Is it a conspiracy? How could they POSSIBLY have more than 2394 if they can ONLY MAKE 57 PER YEAR?!

prompt: rite me article about US only can make 57 tomohok missels a year but looks lik they have moar than that

That's not defense procurement, that's defense de-procurement

> "Actually, I made a mistake. I meant Cursor."

Someone who can't describe the model they're using after asking 3 times across several months, probably isn't the 10x engineer you think they are.

There's no such thing as being too rigorous when you're talking about proofs in math. It either proves it or it doesn't. You get as rigorous as you need to

PLLLLLLEEEAAAASSSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

It just doesn't make any sense. Starts off the user experience with a kick in the nuts and a slap across the face. "You don't own this machine"

it would be easier to use claude to write a cronjob that does the same thing for you but accurately

And yet it probably covers 90% of what people use OpenClaw for.

I want to like swift so bad