Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | corkill's commentslogin

1.5% cash back.

The difference with Ramp is they are connected to your business bank account and can automatically increase your limit as you grow vs traditional companies like AMEX that require you to manually submit your financials and go through review etc. Also just in general better UI/UX and support etc.

We moved to Ramp as AMEX was unable to scale our limit fast enough.


Shareholders benefit from the profits via a rising stock price even if they don't pay out a dividend.


Profit isn't directly correlated to share price.


They meant profit via sell - buy price, ie personal profit, not company profits.


> Shareholders benefit from the profits via a rising stock price (...)

They really don't. That's not how stock works. Paying dividends is the only way the company's profits get to the pockets of shareholders. The rest is just speculation which nowadays is largely unrelated with performance.


They meant profit via sell - buy price, ie personal profit, not company profits.


Do they pay for other software to solve this problem?

What are the painful problems of the people with purchasing power in that market?

At the initial stage I would be looking for them to pay you anything or agree to pay and optimize the pricing model later.


Follow Up Boss | followupboss.com | Senior Product Manager | Remote

We’re a SaaS solution that accelerates sales for real estate teams, self funded, profitable and growing company. Customer-centric https://www.facebook.com/followupboss/reviews

Check out our video on how we work: https://www.followupboss.com/about/

Our eng team is a super talented bunch and we need a PM to help us deliver more value to our customers.

https://boards.greenhouse.io/followupboss/jobs/1418167


In the cart tipping is the default so I assume that may reduce their costs and from the below quora thread sounds like what shoppers rely on.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-tipping-etiquette-for-delivery...


That was my initial reaction though looks like a bit more info coming out that there may be other reasons and the letter may have been written in response to a pending firing. This made the front page of reddit which seems to have turned up some deleted posts.

https://archive.is/AR4XX/image < bourbon delivered to work http://imgur.com/5WJFUAF < "watch me get fired for this"


Follow Up Boss | Full-time | San Francisco or REMOTE

We are seeking outstanding developers to join our small productive team building software used every day by sales teams. We practice Scrum with 1-week sprint cycles for faster development and feedback, chat in Slack constantly and meet in person on regular company retreats. Our roadmap is packed with UX improvements and new features with the goal of making the best product in its class.

We're profitable, customer first and growing.

Director of Engineering (Hands-on) http://grnh.se/2qweks

Senior Front-end Engineer (React, Backbone) http://grnh.se/ka153c

Senior Full Stack Engineer (PHP, MySQL, Postgres, Redis, ElasticSearch) http://grnh.se/kxyj0i

Senior iOS Engineer (iOS client for SaaS product) http://grnh.se/1hkbef

Product Manager https://boards.greenhouse.io/followupboss/jobs/142368#.Voam0...


Are you open to contracting?


People with problems and money to solve those problems aka business owners.


> People with problems and money to solve those problems aka business owners.

I figure as much. But how do I find them?


Internet stocks were trading at all-time highs in 1999. Housing was doing great in 2006. Any asset being at all-time highs doesn't mean there are negligible risks only that the majority of the market currently thinks there is (they might be right and they might be wrong).


I rather doubt there's a bubble in US bonds. We've had "bond vigilante" cycles before. We're not in one now.

Unlike internet stocks or housing, one big factor in bond prices is confidence in the US as a political regime, which remains high.

My interpretation is that the bond market rolls its eyes at the posturing kerfluffle in our electoral politics and ignores it.


Perhaps, but isn't it also true that the US government itself now constitutes a very large part of the bond market? Rarely do I ever hear the term bond vigilantes any more, maybe because there no longer is such a thing, except perhaps under extreme circumstances.


I'm not 100% sure how to answer the first question. Yes, in a way, but those aren't tradable instruments any more - they're part of the Fed balance sheet. And technically, the Fed isn't government.

Yeah, I know....

This is the point - no more bond vigilantes as in days of yore. Bonds are smooth sailing on calm seas. This signals that everybody's on board with the low rates.

So this signals a lack of concern without deficits/debt.


I think you answered your own question that they will make more money this way, which I'm sure all of their investors and employees holding stock will appreciate.

I believe they are quoted somewhere as saying the ASX doesn't understand tech stories like Atlassian though can't dig up the quote right now.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: