We have already banned robotic arms in this case. It’s illegal to make a robot that mass manufactures someone else’s IP. It’s considered copyright infringement and is a well trodden law, the introduction of a machine in the middle doesn’t magically launder the copyright infringement.
It’s interesting to hear your perspective. I personally have had the opposite effect from watching these people on YouTube. I find it highly inspirational and I’ve gone out and made interesting projects on my own without them. Not all educational content needs to be structured like school, in fact most of it shouldn’t. With this stuff it just needs to humanize the process, so you can see the process for yourself, and follow it for yourself.
Families often raise a concern about how they never knew member X to be a baddie (eg The Golden State Killer). This is not a compelling refutation. Whether anyone can be wrong or lying about anything, is equally weak.
Some new apartments in 5-over-2 buildings sure. But developers only build apartments in areas that already have high land value, this includes areas like center city, Phila, the loop in Chicago, the central west end in St. Louis, etc,
It is obviously not the case that developers only build in the Loop in Chicago; in fact, virtually none of the housing built in Chicago is built in the Loop.
I’m looking at one for research purposes. Agent based simulation, non-GPU-implementable Ml modeling, large scale data processing. There are a lot of tasks in my work that are greatly sped up by having tons of threads.
It’s more about the people making 30k a year putting up fencing and barely scraping by watching those 300k a year SWEs complain about how they’re wage slaves.
This line in the tractatus is not about the individual’s knowledge it’s about the entire research programme’s ability to know something fundamentally unknowable. In particular Wittgenstein was referring to logical philosophers talking about metaphysics, which evades logical positivism. Even then he wasn’t against the practice of metaphysics, only the attempt to describe it with hard logic.
That’s an interesting thing you point out. I’m a computational social scientist and I’ve really only seen this with colleagues whose native language doesn’t have pluralization morphology to begin with (East Asians usually). Since code is an irregular pluralization in English, it trips them up. Perhaps it’s a combination of:
Learning to program informally (as most scientists do)
Being a non-native English speaker
My native English speaking colleagues or those from Europe, India, Africa, South America, pluralize code as code.
I didn’t like, do a study on it or anything this is just a pattern I’ve noticed, so your mileage may vary.
