If you have tonsilitis / tonsil stones, that means you have a biofilm there and it’s a very common place for that to happen.

Regular mouthwash and even antibiotics won’t get rid of it, but a solution of vinegar, lemon juice and salt will.

https://youtu.be/0he8BCs8VD0

I don’t understand what your question has to do with op but I’ll explain it to you.

Religion and language are very similar, both in how they are transmitted and how they shift.

The latter systematizes thought and the former emotions.

Language is encoded by vocal utterances, characters, hand gestures, etc…

Religion by rituals, stories, customs. The purpose of it is to handle the common emotional needs of man. The starting point is the grief that comes from a dead person -> you need a ritual to handle the body and process emotions.

Next you need to handle who has sex with whom as that is another big area of emotional turbulence in man.

Then relationships between parent and child. And so on…

Write it down and get people to follow it, you have a religion. Which will shift and split over time as does language.

It can be completely distinct from the origin of everything though many choose to incorporate deities into their stories to give weight and meaning, this harnesses the inherent respect for father figures people tend to be born with to achieve this.

See OpenAI

Intel management engine

“It’s not a vulnerability, it’s a feature!”

How can music be on steaming platforms if the owner who should collect this doesn't consent to it? If it's their label posting it, shouldn't the label be handling renumeration?

Or is this for music distributed by DistroKid, CDBaby etc. before 2018?

Music is broken down into two copyrights: Masters and Publishing.

Masters is the recording themselves, made by recording artists, distributed by record labels and distributors (DistoKid, TuneCore, CD Baby, etc.)

Publishing is the "work" or the song... made by songwriters, and royalties are processed by Music Publishers and PROs (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC).

A good way to wrap your head around it is... I can record a cover of Katy Perry's Firework... I can distribute that master (and make money) to DSPs like Spotify etc... but I do not own the "song" Firework.

The Mechanical Licensing Collective (the MLC) is the body that governs US digital streaming mechanical royalties, which is a right on the publishing side.

Just a note ... "mechanical" royalties are publishing royalties payable when a duplicate is created. Back when the duplicate was sheet music or a record pressing that made sense linguistically. Nowadays, mechanicals are due when a stream is done or a digital copy is made.

Public performances like a live concert get a different category of license.

You don't need permission for radio-style playback of songs (in the US). There's a mechanical license available and royalties go to a rights collective.

Playing specific songs on demand requires permission, IIRC.

Specifically, meaning making. The same situation can be perceived as negative, neutral, or positive all depending on how the individual interprets it.

The classic example that's a bit wrong is a glass of water half empty or half full.

The true optimist doesn't see it as half full, he sees it as full. Half with water, half with air (being grateful for the air as well.)

The neutral person sees it as half full, and the depressive sees it as half empty.

There’s also wide.video which is has more features

It actually sounds like you pretty much got it, except for #4. The intention was to show that you can use free text to write a cadence, there was the blue writing caret to indicate that. But it might be too subtle.

And for #6, that's how the idea actually started. I asked myself "what would happen if I prompted myself like an AI?" and it turns out, it was a great experience.

What about the blue line indicates that? The blue line did not indicate anything to me as there’s no flow.

> It actually sounds like you pretty much got it

Awesome, so I got that it doesn't make any sense.

And then when you post it for people to look at they call it AI slop and viral marketing

Except in this case for this app you’re simply complaining that your app is rejected on “being ai”. I am also on team Apple, as I have no idea what this app actually does.

It definitely has a free trial, and yeah it prints 3 tools:

* a timeline which pulls in your calendar (you can use this to timebox as well as timetrack.)

* a daily list of prompts, which are scheduled using recur rules (which you can generate using natural language.) a prompt is useful for lots of things, which is the hard part of explaining it

* a list of your reminders for the reminders app, which can also work like a lighter version of prompts and/or todos.

Basically this app combines digital and paper planning and journaling into one page that's easier to carry and more useful than anything else (imo.)

These three bullet points paint a much clearer picture of what this app does (I’ve not used it, so I can’t say whether or not the picture it paints is accurate) than the screenshots or description that are currently on the App Store.

I was wrong about the lack of a free trial.