Couldn't most visualizations just be a table unless the row count is too high?
Edit: This is one possible strategy that used to be employed to progressively enhance table into info graphics or data vis. Proposing a table as the best solution seems needlessly reductionist.
I mispoke, there's the rank dimension, which would make this a big table. Still I think the animation took too long to settle, I was bored waiting and annoyance didn't add enough value to final infographic for me. It would be more justifiable if datapoints/balls dropped with the time axis since there'a might be an interesting story there that would warrant animation.
Execs at company I worked for wanted to send data to another company. They asked us to work with their vendor who used AI to map data and fix it………the vendor had a bunch of MBAs and no devs. They kept saying AI without any substance and were completely useless and time wasters. Eventually we reached out to the original company and mapped the data ourselves in a day…no AI needed.
I had a very similar experience with SnapLogic. It was much easier to just do the integration ourselves. We needed to integrate with a service that had a great Open API Spec, but were initially encouraged to use SnapLogic because it could do this magically for us. Turns out, you save money and time doing the integration yourself.
Turns out they are already geolocking. EU and US have different app stores. When I visited Poland I needed to install an app to install eSIM for my phone and couldn’t do it.
Had to change the country on my account and it dropped all my subscriptions. Then I had issue when I came back with apps not updating. So I had to fiddle with it again.
I haven’t tried this yet but apparently easier way is to create a separate account, log into it to download required app then log back into your main account.
My pain hinges between EV charging apps and family sharing.
Interestingly, this exact problem would be solved if they really allowed side loading. This is not an issue at all on desktop platforms and it shouldn't be on mobile.
I wish every dev would try projects and things completely unrelated to computers.
I enjoy being outside.
These headlines “projects every dev should try” really annoy me. I try to put in enough effort at work, and that’s tough. But I have been messing with computers for over 20 years now.
We're on Hacker News. Do you go to a fitness community and say "I wish every gym bro would put down a dumbell and pick up a book?"
But if you're curious, I hike, am learning Japanese, and want to eventually clean up and pick back up my saxophone once I can get the money to get it fixed. Tech is a big but not the only part of my life.
I think it’s important that those who want a 9-5-only are able to get it, and those who want to make it their calling in life are also able to have that
>This site selects for people who have made computers their entire life
isn't it the other way around? The site allows anyone to post on nearly any topic, but the longest standing audience veers tech. there still is quite a few topics on medicine, transportation, economics, and politics as well.
> Consider this an unsolicited reminder to touch grass.
Do you find yourself personally attacked by someone doing something that you don’t enjoy?
Or is the notion of them having fun AND improving their direct skill?
Outside of ones feelings for Trump ...Ivana holds the standard of beauty. Those who loathe him prior to their dislike of him ..those ppl and the majority of them thought the same about her looks. That she is natural beauty even prior to any plastic surgery.
Attractiveness runs in Trumps family. He afterall was the Paris Hilton / Kardashians of the 80s and early 90s. Those types of socialites have beauty and wealth and society loves to follow them because of it.
It’s most likely a mix of things. Life in US is really fucking expensive once you have a child and a home.
Our daycare for one kid is $1600. Same as mortgage, luckily we put down a large down payment and bought at low rates.
Also, if you have health issue, that also makes things pretty extreme. Healthcare is just brutal in US for low income people. Insurance can cost anywhere from $0 to $3000+. Depending on employment and family situation.
Personal finance education is also pretty bad. I know many people who are absolutely awful with finances and don’t do basic math. They don’t think how money can generate more money but what they can buy. 20% of luxury goods buyers are making under $50k. This isn’t always the case though.
If you make little money and don’t have connections it is really hard to get ahead. Once you start using credit cards and loans to eat and pay for housing the finance charges eat you alive.
I was pretty poor and even used food stamps when I went back to school in my 20s. It wasn’t until I made connections with people in high places when getting jobs and opportunities became easy. I’m lazier than I was before, I work less than I worked before, yet make much more money.
Part of it is that luxury goods have a wide variety of prices. A $100 watch might be classified as a "luxury good" or a $200 pair of earrings. Part of it is it was about buyers, not total purchases or dollar value.
The people who stretch to buy a pair of $300 jeans as a Christmas present are on equal footing in that statistic to the people who dress head to toe in Gucci and never wear the same thing twice.
So, yeah, 1/5 people buying a luxury good making it the item they splurge on while making under $50,000 is reasonable.
Regulators aren't going to make it illegal, but you are still entitled to your opinion. You can't stop a determined human ignoring or bypassing safety systems from getting themselves killed. It is an unfortunate reality. I am not without empathy, just pragmatic when you try to build systems to protect humans and they do what they do. "Make something idiot-proof, and they will build a better idiot."
Until regulators pull it from vehicles, we're going to carry on with it except for folks who get themselves killed (with some economic drag from these legal proceedings).
Is the problem lane keeping, traffic adaptive cruise control, and automatic emergency braking? Or is it the marketing around it and how people use it? Maybe it's the lack of a controlled stop when the driver attention check fails?
Plenty of other cars have driver assistance features, but we don't hear about people not paying attention to their well equiped Pacifica and it crashing into things. Maybe because there's no videos from Chyrsler saying the car is driving itself, driver there for legal purposes only. Maybe because the driver assistance equipped unit sales are lower. Maybe the collisions are happening, but don't make the news.
Driver assistance features seem like a good idea if used properly. Drive normally, but the computer is always supervising and will help if it sees a problem you don't. They don't work well when the easily distractable human driver is supposed to be supervising the computer.
Honesty I don’t know what causes it. Driving assist stuff is great.
My Hyundai actually has great lane keep assist, emergency braking, cross traffic alert and braking, plus radar cruise. It will disengage lane keep and radar cruise if you don’t put your hands back on the wheel after alerts.
Maybe it’s because many buyers are younger? Or Tesla appears to be more techy and futuristic? Or maybe it is the weird approach to marketing musk is doing. It is a bit reckless imo.
I don’t really care if someone dies being an idiot and ignoring warnings. I do care if they slam into another driver that has no choice but to share the road with a Tesla.
> Model Y also received a leading score of 98 percent in Euro NCAP's Safety Assist category. This result was achieved with Model Y vehicles equipped with Tesla Vision, our camera vision and neural net processing system that now comes standard in all Tesla vehicles delivered in North America and Europe. This score was a result that many did not believe was possible without using radar.
(own four Teslas of varying vintages, from 2018 to 2021, have driven over 120k miles on Autopilot)
What you are referring to is safety rating, which nobody is disputing, however, it did not prove "vision" superior. The car is safe for sure but it wasn't because of vision but of structure.
Vision replaced front facing radar for AEB and TACC (traffic aware cruise control). The safety tests including automatic emergency braking, which Vision provides signal for with regards to forward travel. Automated lane changes were always Vision.
That and user driven lane change automation. (fully automatic lane changes for navigation or speed management is apparently in beta based on Tesla's online manual [1]).
IMHO, that's kind of the root of the problem. As individual features, it's not super exciting, but when you call it autopilot, people think it does more than it does (which is fairly true of airplane autopilot as well).
I mean the lane change and using navigation is a pretty big jump from the Hyundai system which is dumb.
Hyundai would not be able to attempt to drive me home. While, you can get into a Tesla, enter an address and hope for the best.
Calling it autopilot is for sure part of the problem. The average individual is dumb and won’t ever open a manual or read any prompts. But then again they are there for legal reasons.
