And both from WebOS.

There's a new third-party F to Z adapter that does have the screw drive: https://nikonrumors.com/2025/02/28/monsteradapter-la-fz1-off...

I don't believe the built in virtualization framework supports emulation, but you can do this with QEMU. An easy way to get started is with UTM:

https://mac.getutm.app

I tried UTM - didn't like it, inconsistent, shows a black screen and you don't know what's going on. Use qemu instead.

Poster specifically mentioned CS3, which was a perpetual license. Adobe is not incentivized to keep a version of their software someone purchased once seventeen years ago working when they would much rather sell a monthly subscription.

Trump set up a whole university!

And he ran a charity!

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2017/06/06/how-don...

Toyota is your example of an EU company?

Toyota Baltic Aktsiaselts is an EU company and it has a fake ‘beneficial owner’. But clearly some entity, or series of entities, must actually own it.

So it is an example of the information in at least one section being completely unreliable, with not even an attempt of an ‘owned by non-eu parent company’ disclaimer explaining why it’s fine to list a random senior manager as something that he’s clearly not…

Companies have to have at least some minimum registration where they conduct enough business.

Not really. The only generation of Xbox that was competitive was the 360, which still came in third in sales, just not as distantly.

Having Halo as an exclusive was huge.

Hagiography?

The Washington Post has endorsed a candidate every election cycle since 1976, with the exception of 1988. The New York Times has endorsed a candidate in every presidential election since its founding in 1851.

yes. its always been done and therefore is good! …?

What was said was: "In the 90s newspapers made an effort to not endorse candidates to appear unbiased".

This was countered with "endorsements have been a thing since long before the 90s".

Previous poster didn't say anything about what's "good" or "bad". They pointed out a claim was incorrect.

Just because it has always been done doesn't make it good.

It's surprising to me that a news organization not publishing an opinion piece is itself giant front page news

What's so bad about large institutions in the opinion shaping space endorsing?

Nothing, I suppose. I honestly didn't realize it's so contentious. I guess it just seemed kind of weird for "the news" to have an opinion at all. Why do people want an organization to tell them who they think should be president?

Samsung beat them to it. It wasn't a market success.