Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bufferoverflow's commentslogin

> against law abiding immigrants

That's a lie. They broke the law when they entered the country illegally. Then some of them committed more crimes.


Most immigration offenses are specifically not crimes, so that the government doesn't have to give the people involved legal proceedings.


The immigrants in thr court houses are breaking the law? Sounds like a judge should determine that.


If they crossed the border illegally, yes, they broke the law. You don't need a judge to determine that.

Just like you don't need a judge to determine if someone drives without a driver's license.


The judge determines whether or not they crossed the border illegally. Who did you think does that?


Someone scammed some people out of BTC that was bought at an ATM.

Therefore, somehow, the ATM is at fault.

It make no sense, I hope the ATM owners sue and win.


That's like suing knife manufacturers because some people stab other people.

We have no realistic short-term plan to switch away from oil. Everyone can't just switch to EVs. Most products have plastics or oil derivatives in them.

It will take a long time.


I don't think it's quite that simple. We would likely be in a much better position, up to potentially having a plan, if oil companies hadn't covered things up for so long and lobbied against regulations.


Nobody stopped anyone from making EVs or not using oil products.

We use oil because it's cheap and versatile, not because evil oil companies are forcing us.

There's no replacement for oil at the moment. Sure, you can manufacture some plastics of CO2, but they are so expensive, even you don't use them.


> Nobody stopped anyone from making EVs or not using oil products.

Quite literally oil companies do. They have a habbit of constantly trying to undercut anything that might affect their sales.


>There's no replacement for oil at the moment

Vraiment, pas de substitut?


> Nobody stopped anyone from making EVs or not using oil products

thats exactly what the lawsuit is about


> any backdoor must necessarily be on the client side

True, but it might be a part of an update that only hits a white-list of users, so you won't find the actual code that steals your private keys if you're on that list.


This is not allowed as far as I know, at least on iOS.

iOS apps aren't allowed to run arbitrary code that hasn't been signed by Apple. What goes in the AppStore is what runs on your device, and apps are physically incapable of writing data to executable memory. Safari / the built-in Javascript interpreter (and I guess third-party browsers in the EU) are notable exceptions here, as they need JIT.

Sure, Apple could develop special infrastructure to push fake updates to a predesignated list of targets, but at that point, you don't even need collaboration from Meta, and open source apps like Signal are just as vulnerable.

If Apple was willing to go that way, they wouldn't even need to bother with app updates. Ultimately, your messaging history has to be stored on your device in a way that your device can decrypt, and Apple could just steal that info.

I can't speak to what the situation is like on Android, but I presume similar mechanisms exist.


Decriminalization in Portugal and in Oregon ended up in disasters. Resulted in more drug addicts, more violent crime, more crazy behaviors, more people laying or crawling in the streets.

https://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/the-hard-drug-decrimina...


That article is concluding that decriminalisation in Portugal didn't work, by comparing drug users in 2022 with the year of decriminalisation in 2001, and comparing overdose rates between 2018 and 2022. I don't find that very honest.

Consumption is rising worldwide, and nobody knows what these metrics would show had Portugal not decriminalised consumption of hard drugs.

Also, the reason for decriminalisation wasn't simply to lower addiction rates, it was mostly to stop getting people in jail for consuming, which was making the issue worse.


I agree that decriminalization in Oregon didn't go well, but it's more complicated that "decriminalization doesn't work". I lived in Portland at the time (and yes, I voted for decriminalization). What I observed:

  - The rehab programs were never properly available
  
  - The general culture in Portland made it very difficult for the city to form any coherent response to homelessness. Most people in Portland really want to be "compassionate" to the homeless/drug addicted/mentally ill, so there was strong pushback on any effort to clear homeless encampments (literally to the point that people were advocating for changes in building code that would force commercial buildings to *enable* homeless people to sleep in front of them by building sleeping platforms.)
  
  - This time period overlaps the BLM protests (which were absolutely massive in Portland), with all the "Defund the Police" / "ACAB". Indeed, the majority of Portland has been very anti-police since the late '90s. The police, obviously, didn't like this. From anec-data, it seemed to me that the street cops just stopped even bothering arresting people. (Here's an anecdote - a friend of mine was riding mass transit, with homeless men both behind him and in front of him, who got in to a conflict that resulted in one man brandishing a knife. The police were called and showed up at the next stop, no arrests were made.)
 To make the point abundantly clear, the brandishing of knives in public was never decriminalized, but the police absolutely stopped enforcing *any* laws on the homeless.

  - Oregon is generally terrible at implementing anything, even well-supported, popular programs fail to achieve even basic milestones of success. There's also a general lack of funding for most everything.

  - COVID

  - Fenatnyl use rose massively, nationwide, in spite of local drug policy. The negative effects have definitely been more pronounced in far-left cities, but it's disingenuous to assume that decriminalization increased usage.
Don't get me wrong, things got bad. They still are - it's why my wife and I moved after living there for decades. But let's not declare decriminalization as a universally bad policy; the drug war has also been extremely bad too, and it's had a lot more time to work. IMO, the very existince of fentanyl and carafentanyl are direct results of the drug war.


Things got so bad, that you had to move, as a result of all the policies that you support. Consider that your policies are not good, and your defense of them doesn't look like defense at all.

And some of your reasons make no sense. COVID/fentanyl didn't just hit Portland.

> stopped even bothering arresting people

Oh, look, the direct consequence of your actions and your policies. You declare that ALL cops are bad, and then complain when they stop doing what they do. And your DA releases nearly all arrested people without a charge because "compassion", so cops have no reason to arrest anyone.

Again, consider that your policies and ideas are horrible.


Do you personally pay every time you quote copyrighted books or song lyrics?


How so? All the models they've tested are obsolete, multiple generations behind high-end versions.

(Though even these obsolete models did better than the best humans and domain experts).


As I wrote, the main point of the paper was not the specific model evaluation, but the development of a benchmark which can be used to test new models.

Good benchmark development is hard work. The paper goes into the details of how it was carried out.

Now that the benchmark is available, you or anyone else could use it to evaluate the current high-end versions, and measure how the performance has changed over time.

You could also use their paper to help understand how to develop a new benchmark, perhaps to overcome some limitations in the benchmark.

That benchmark and the contents of that paper are not obsolete until there is a better benchmark and description of how to build benchmarks.


I have so many big batteries in the house, it's scary. I've been thinking of building a fireproof enclosure for them from rockwool or ceramic fiber.

Our big batteries, other than the EV in the garage, are from the e-foil, they are like 40lbs, lots of energy.


In the RC model aircraft community a common recommendation is to create safe containers to charge large lipo batteries in. People often charge their batteries in old barbecue grills, toolboxes, sandboxes, etc.


I think they can explode even when not charging.


Decent 1080p quality. Not bluray level, but getting close. Definitely ahead of every other video generator.

Video production just got a lot cheaper and requires very few skills. This is basically destroying the creative video production industry (ads, product videography, youtube content of all kinds) and probably VFX industry as well.


It's beating Google Veo 3 in the model arena:

https://artificialanalysis.ai/text-to-video/arena?tab=leader...

They've been running tests for weeks under the covert name "Unicorn" and just renamed the model to Seedance a few days ago.

edit: I'm not sure why I'm being downvoted for this, except perhaps not liking the ByteDance angle.

China produces incredibly good video models and have been in the market lead for at least a year now. All of the top video models, save for Veo 3, are from China.

In fact, the only open source video models of note are all non-American (mostly Chinese, and one Israeli model).


We almost never charge our EV to 100%, to not degrade the battery faster.


But, if you are going to offer “absorbing energy from the grid as a service” the capacity you have to offer can only be

  <absolute max that you are willing to charge your battery to> - <minimum that you are willing have your battery sitting at> 
There definitely could be some gap there, but it does depend on the car sitting at less than “full” (however you define full).


Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: