Thinking about abuse potential, is there such a thing as irreversible finger-printing of media generated like this? So that even bad actors couldn't hide the fact that it was generated by AI.
Being a student not in a narrow sense of being enrolled in a school, but being someone who studies and learns new things by doing rather than simply doing the given task in a conventional/quick/easy way that may not resolve the underlying issues that caused the problems in the first place.
1) The "new" module system. (Which is, IMO, way to hard to disable for legacy code)
2) Removing some old crypto support from the default provider. And removing even mire support when a "secure valudation" flag was set. Probably for the best, but still broke stuff.
Other than that, the only Java code that really feels legacy is:
A) Pre generic collections.
B) an overuse of design patterns (normally not a language issue, although there are still a few bad APIs in the standard library)
C) Long form classes where a lambda would suffice.
Given how much the language has changed, that's a pretty impressive list. And a day with a linter can modernize most of a codebase without much effort.
Good point, but it is interesting that the computations to render visual worlds in high fidelity is the same computation to "ingest" the data to create a model.
Reminds me of how a mic is a speaker and speaker is a mic.