I struggle with managing hundred of channel after connecting slack accounts. Is can you tell how you did it?

Glowing Bear has a preference to hide channels that don't have any activity.

As for using wee-slack in Weechat, go.py helps. I bind it to meta-g, it's a script that lets you jump to channels by typing the name. Also, /part any channels you're not interested in.

In Glowing Bear, meta-g jumps to the search bar that filters buffers as you type. Now that I think about it, a fuzzy search with ranking would be a nice improvement to reduce the number of characters needed.

Is this like lambda(aws) for C?

I suppose a procedure that responds to an http request is now called a lambda.

No...?

That's what it reads like, yeah.

When I first try FF 58, its my exp also. But after FF 59, I gave it another try, much better. Did u tried it with 58 or 59?

still check if pitch to zoom available every week from FF. My eyes is not good without zooming :(

What good of a built in terminal? Thanks

In Emacs the shell-mode allow me to use the shell as any other buffer, with random access and scrolling. I can cut and paste stuff just like in any other text buffer, manipulate the output of my session to save it to some file / send it to someone else, etc. IDK how it is in nvim but I'm quite pleased with shell in Emacs, can't go back at all. Though if you're using tmux or maybe screen you can probably do similar things.

The Vim :sh is much more limited. I actually kind of stopped using it a while ago because it the workflow was so jarring, especially on Windows.

Neovim's :terminal is from what I can tell more or less equivalent to Emacs's shell.

I'm not sure I understood your question. This is the terminal: https://neovim.io/doc/user/nvim_terminal_emulator.html

If you're asking what good is a built in terminal, well, there's plenty of scenarios. One I'm facing right now is using GVim on Windows. Have you ever seen what happens when you type !dir in GVim, right now? It's really ugly.

I don't use it as a terminal. However, it makes things like fzf integrate quite nicely with neovim. The later looks and interacts awfully in vim.

What cases I should use this? I mean, look like it used for simple/beginning project, when ORM can do quite handy

An ORM is a library integrated into a language runtime. Postgrest is a service – a separate process – which sits in front of a Postgres database, offering a RESTful HTTP API over that database. This means web or mobile HTTP clients can access the database in a safe, controlled manner.

Postgrest basically shifts the work of writing a basic CRUD API (a task for which you would probably use an ORM) to declaring a SQL schema. From that schema, it infers which endpoints should exist and what they should do. For a certain class of web app, this can be a HUGE time saver.

Beyond that, consider checking out the "Motivation" section of the website: https://postgrest.com/en/v0.4/intro.html

To be fair, you could do the same with an abstraction layer over an ORM.

I'm designing a web app that doesn't need much actual backend, save some static data slightly too large to ship with the static files. I have nginx serving static files and proxying db requests to postgrest.

What specific ORM do you have in mind when you write "handy?" I'd really like to know in case I've missed something.

Hi guys, can you suggest me any laptop + os that have trackpad work like apple's (multi guesture, smooth scrolling) I love to leave them but, their trackpad... are so good. I can use *nix quite ok, so os isn't a problem for my dev station.

if other than mac, I has a solid trackpad like apple's. Then I switch right away. Anyone recommend something good? Thanks

sorry but when should I use this?