Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more alfor's commentslogin

There is no countries in Europe, it's the Europe union, the WEF. Just look at your immigration policy and birth rate. Europe is commiting suicide.

The US is waking up from that strange nightmare, going back to self gouvernance.

Don't be afraid of Trump, look instead at what is happening at home.

(all big US monopolies are trojan horses, same is true for China)


Add incandescent light to your setup. The lack of near infrared is destroying our health and it's most evident with eyes.

Go outside, have incandescent lights.


I was thinking about this too - my eyes find the white LED light quite harsh. I've found warm / yellow LED lighting to be more soothing to the eyes.


What you are chasing is your god or a spiritual quest.

As you don't have a conception of a global god on top of all the other you swing from one to another: finding myself, doing hard, things, robotics, climate change, girlfriend, pleasure, etc.

Those can all be good things, but they are not the top thing.

"You will have no other god beside me"

The central God is you idea of good, the things beyond your reach.

You keep your girlfriend, she become your wife and you have kids. You can climb montains but it doesn't need to be himalaya, etc. Maybe your big thing will still end up around physics Everything in it's place. In the proper amount.

Now if you loose one thing it's not the end of your world.

This keep you centered and avoid the crazy swings.

As we can see in this tale, his god was the startup or money. Once he had more than enought no motivation was left, he killed his god and had to find another one. This happen to a lot of people that reach their goal, instead of being happy they are emotionaly destroyed.

I hope this is clear and can help others.


Why move away from X?


Google became an asset of the government. By selecting what you see they control what you think, what you buy who you vote for, similar to legacy media.

Open AI has started on day one with that goal.


This conspiracy theory is broken, because governments around the world have been struggling more than previously to get reelected. It might be that Google has been used to "select what you see so they control what you think, what you buy who you vote for, similar to legacy media", but they're not doing so under the control of government.


This was proven in the Twitter files. The same was happening in Facebook and Google.

There also independant research that prove this. hard to Google ;)

Basicaly it's proven that just switching the autocomplete when you search Trump or Kamala can sway the votes of undecided by huge margin.

The seek those and switch the suggestion were it matter.

They also incite people to go vote depending on the choice and buch of other dirty tricks.

You are right that it no longer work. In the end truth will always win because it connect to reality. Having just X switching to truth will swarm the world.


watch this is you are still unaware of the totalitarian machine.

https://youtu.be/ye8MOfxD5nU


32,571.4% ? 320X the limit?

Why do we continue down that path, are we that stupid collectively? We know the fertility of men is falling year after year, we know this, yet things go on as if it's not important.

We could calmly debate the amount on the limit, but at this point we know the job we have to do.


Conterpoint: Phone are small and replace so much more stuff: radio, flashlight, camera, video recorder, landlines, computers, etc.

Grind them up and recycle the metals in them.

in 20 years the tech will be so far more advanced and will lead to even more dematerialisation.

The real waste is the waste of human potential by social media that is destroying the yought for profit.


Jira and the modern cargo cult agile make me hate software development.

The important part is to create a team, people working together, helping each other, trusting each other.

Anything that increase trust and organic collaboration is useful, most of the rest is a waste of time.

Ex: if your estimates are used once to put the blame on someone, congratulation you just destroyed the morale and trust of the whole team. Now everyone will start to lie and pad their estimates, the game is now how to behave to cover your ass and the one of your friends.


The real problem is screens of all sorts: gaming and cellphones.

Most kids have unlimited access to internet so it's video games and porn for boys and social and games for girls.

The roads and curbs didn't change here, but the amount of time outside definitely did.


Average cars got bigger and heavier with a higher line of sight since even the 90s, making them exponentially more dangerous for everyone outside them. Cars are the second leading cause of child mortality in the US


Link below has some interesting plots. One shows child pedestrian deaths per 100k population going steadily down since 70s. Yet adult pedestrian deaths have recently ticked up.

https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/pedes...


And very few children die, because generally children are not very likely to die. So, what?


someone’s never hooked up with Gen Z

Many girls are negatively affected by their porn consumption as well and this is a huge blindspot with the default focus on boys


It is possible that kids spending more time in front of screens is at least partly an effect of it not being safe for them to go outside on their own, rather than then kids spending time in front of screens simply being the cause of them not playing outside.


The road didn't change here but the behaviour changed drastically


Does it generate constant profit?

Maybe I am too cynical, but I don't expect the pharma industry to fix something that is good for the bottom line.

How much tri-therapy cost?


Why don't you go invent a cure for HIV then, and do better than the existing Pharma companies?


He will do morally much better, if he succeeds in funding the development of said cure, and in actually making it.

But he will be competing with more interesting propositions, investment-wise, in he form of subscription drugs.

Ergo, "why ?" is "probably because of money".


It is twice yearly, so yes.


That must be why we don’t have any cures for diseases


You aren't making the joke you seem to think you are.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: