Do we really know why LLMs seem to score the highest with python related coding tasks? I would think there are equally good examples of javascript/c++/java code to train from but I always see python with the highest scores.
I'm genuinely asking this out of curiosity and a bit of naivety — are there as many international students pursuing advanced degrees in China as there are in the U.S.? I don't know the answer and would love to hear from folks who do.
I believe this is actually the second time google has tried to buy this company too. They had to give them a too good to refuse offer.
While it seems like we aren't getting a ton of people who have used the product in the comments. I can tell you it checks a lot of boxes to make people sleep better at night with customer data in the cloud.
its not even just arch linux. you can literally buy a PC from anyone who sells ubuntu 24.04 and you still cant properly install (and have them work out of the box) snap store items like shutter.
based on information and background they thoroughly gave when releasing their research its pretty easy to put together that it did take them significantly less resources to train this model. only having specific parameters available at a time instead of activating everything all at once is pretty ingenious.
that and they just happened to be undergoing a large scale "cyber attack"
A recent matched cohort study published in the British Journal of Psychiatry analyzed data from over nine million UK adults between 2000 and 2019 to assess life expectancy and years of life lost among those diagnosed with ADHD. The research included 30,039 adults with diagnosed ADHD and compared them to 300,390 matched individuals without the diagnosis. Findings revealed that adults with diagnosed ADHD experienced a significant reduction in life expectancy, losing approximately 6.78 years for males and 8.64 years for females compared to the general population. This disparity is likely driven by modifiable risk factors and unmet mental and physical health needs associated with ADHD and its comorbid conditions. The study underscores the critical need for enhanced support and treatment services for adults with ADHD in the UK to address these preventable health inequalities and improve overall life outcomes.
from what I know the bids that have been put in place are just for the US operations and there are some bids that dont include the algo as a part of the deal.
A.I. wont be a bust, but your investment in something simply because it "uses AI" might not be a smart choice.
I can't blame people for attaching "uses AI" to their pitch to get funding. But I will blame people giving them money for not being able to tell the difference between something revolutionary and something that never needed AI in the first place.
This has been a huge frustration with AI investments as I’m invest in industry and “AI ETFs” just invest in anything with AI on the website. Investors have absolutely no idea how AI works or what it will disrupt, and I genuinely think 99% of all investor sentiment towards AI is non-sense
The company I work for try to add AI/LLM on everything, instead of trying to improve/fix the underlying problem, they now just add the magic AI and everything is “perfect” now.
As an ML engineer and AI developer, I don’t see the real value at all, not to mention the added cost of using LLM
Going down the tangent of people working in the industry...
I unwittingly fell into low-level coding for DL software stacks about 7 years ago.
At first I was merely uninterested in the topic, compared to my teammates.
Now I think there's a serious possibility that LLMs and other new DL capabilities will be a net negative for society. I'm actively trying to get other work.
I know that if I don't do the work others gladly will, but the status quo seers my conscience.
Personally, I don't even think this is sillyness. yes it should be strict to release apps and you should be accountable and have to explain why you need access to specific permissions on the app stores.
The age of open permissions is should be long over.
I'm sick over overreaching app permissions wasting my battery trying to collect more data on me. If you want more data, provide more value.
But it's a camera app. Of course it needs the camera.
It's not overreaching app permission, it's been rejected because the text "The camera will be used to take photographs" wasn't considered a good enough explanation for the permission.
If you cant sufficiently explain why your app needs the permissions it does thats on you and the submitter needs to take accountability here. Resubmit with a better explanation.
I get that the app store is strict. But its strict for a reason. Apple or the app store isn't out to get your app or you.
All right, mister smarty pants. Let's hear it then: What is a better explanation than "this app need camera permissions, because it takes photos, because it is a fucking camera app"?
Halide is a professional-grade camera application that offers advanced photography features such as manual controls, RAW and ProRAW capture, live histograms, focus peaking, depth capture, macro photography, augmented reality overlays, adaptive gesture controls, exposure tools like zebra stripes, and advanced video recording options. In order to provide these functionalities, these require camera permissions to access and control the device's camera hardware in real-time. Each feature relies on direct interaction with the camera to adjust settings, analyze live image data, and offer immediate feedback, making camera access essential for the app to function as intended and enhance the overall user experience.
moral of the story. spend 3 extra minutes writing something out and save yourself from a headache.
why are we assuming every person that reviews apps knows what ur app does? with submissions like this the explain it like im 5 approach is necessary.
I agree that permission requests should include sufficient context -- but I think that paragraph is way too long for the purpose. People do not read unexpected dialog text. I'd save that for the App Store description, when people are more receptive to detail.
For the permission request, I'd condense your paragraph into a sentence or two.
It's not unusual to download an app, but not launch it immediately. Demanding that the user remember your App Store description is unfair. It's your baby, not theirs.
They might not launch your app for hours or days after downloading. And Apple, reasonably I think, wants developers to try harder to accommodate user's realities.
There's strict, and there's kafkaian. It's not as if the reason why a camera app would require the camera is pretty obscure, especially if neither the app nor the permission text changed that much between reviews.
reply