> I still could not accurately identify one of her songs by audio if my life depended on it OR if someone offered me $100 million I'd definitely lose out on that money.
Both this comment and the comment it's responding to are indicative of people living in their own bubbles. It's entirely reasonable that plenty of people just don't expose themselves to contexts where they would have had any opportunity to hear any given musical genre. This is easier than it's ever been since the invention of radio, thanks to the fracturing of culture via recommendation algorithms and the long tail that the internet facilitates.
An even easier way to not be familiar with her: living in a country where she's not that important: <https://chartmasters.org/taylor-swifts-global-heatmap/>. So it's pretty easy in: Chile, Switzerland, Italy, France, Argentina, Costa Rica, Spain, Netherlands, Southern America in general, Eastern Europe, Northern Europe... Lots of countries really. Living in a given country is not much of a bubble. Imagining that pop stars popular where you live are universally popular is very much a bubble.
If you don't listen to the radio, how could you hear them? I'm probably in the only demographic that doesn't have swifties, most people my age streams movies and uses adblockers so I honestly couldn't identify a song by her if I didn't write her name in Youtube just to see what the deal is.
Music is so fragmented these days that there's no comparison to Pink Floyd and Rolling Stones days.
Almost as interesting as this story has been the comments online.
Everyone, everywhere just parroting and re-parroting the same comments, attitude, pretending to understand the engineering with snippets from comments they’ve read, reactive talking points, etc…
Very strange.
Did anyone else feel like an alien following this story online?
Not really. I work with a company that does this kind of stuff (deep see exploration vehicle design), materials science is a tricky but very interesting subject. When someone seemingly does 'the impossible', subjects paying passengers to extreme risks and throws the rulebook on safe design out of the porthole you can bet there will be an entry in 'Risks Digest' at some point or another.
Carbon fiber is a great material, if used where it shines. For this application I don't think it is a good choice, even if it worked a few times. What I didn't understand is the focus on the electronics and the control system, those are irrelevant if the hull isn't going to work out.
> What I didn't understand is the focus on the electronics and the control system, those are irrelevant if the hull isn't going to work out.
Two reasons, I think. First, the (apparent) shoddiness of a control mechanism is easily understood, whereas the reasons why carbon fiber makes a poor choice for a pressure hull are more difficult to understand. Consequently, the use of a game controller is a more salient example of a company cutting corners than their choice of material in the pressure hull. (This is somewhat undermined by the fact that a game controller actually isn't necessarily a problem--Ars Technica ended up running articles on consecutive days with the first one being a tee-hee-they're-using-a-game-controller article and the second one being a why-the-military-uses-game-controllers article.)
The second reason may be that some people would rather focus on the potential failure that admits a possibility that the inhabitants are alive instead of potential the failure that guaranteed their death before the search started.
> Carbon fiber is a great material, if used where it shines. For this application I don't think it is a good choice, even if it worked a few times. What I didn't understand is the focus on the electronics and the control system, those are irrelevant if the hull isn't going to work out.
That's all true, but the use of the Logitech game controller and and other consumer-grade electronics rightfully drew scorn of its own.
I deal with automotive electronics, which is less rigorous than aerospace and/or military applications, never mind deep sea operation. Even so, in the automotive space, there is considerable attention paid to making the housings, cables and the electronics themselves robust with regards to the environmental conditions. Heat, cold, moisture, dirt, vibration, salt, etc. The idea of using non-redundant, consumer grade electronics to control a deep sea vessel is ridiculous. Just being regularly exposed to salty air could induce corrosion in critical components.
I think you're under estimating the controller and over estimating your understanding of the conditions it would live on the vessel. Why it's non redundant? There were likely spares around, if it misbehaves you can get a new one in seconds.
It really depends on the environmental conditions. In the case of a deep sea submersible you might expect that the controller will always be in controlled indoor conditions, depending on when/where they open the hatch. In normal operation it's going to be dry, and if there's a leak the controller probably isn't going to be of much use anyway. (same goes with the rest of the electronics).
A car is of course much different, most components have to operate for years without maintenance in a very uncontrolled, varied set of environments.
Salty sea air and sea spray are all around you on a ocean-going ship. I'm sure they weren't intentionally dunking the Logitech controller into sea water, but that doesn't mean that it couldn't possibly be effected by the environment.
The Logitech controller isn't sealed for moisture. A single drop of sea water on it can slide inside and start the corrosion process. It looks fine on the outside, because the plastic isn't as affected.
Most of the buttons on a commercial grade PC input device use conductive carbon pads pressing against bare metal contacts on a PCB. Yes, the contacts may be gold plated, but there is still exposed copper on the sides.
Heck, even ordinary contamination from skin oil has caused one my keyboard's keys to stop working. I was able to take the keyboard apart and clean it, fixing the problem. The keyboard was never exposed to anything beyond a normal office environment, and never had liquid spilled on it.
Marine grade switches are waterproof and dustproof:
My point was highlighting how strange it has been reading commentary of the event online. I mean no offense at all (!) but even your comment plays into it perfectly in a way.
If this is the first time you observe this then you're going to be pretty bored soon because most discussion about such subjects follow that exact same pattern.
i didn’t see the game pad as the cause, but an indicator of where they would cut corners.
it’s strange on its face to use a game controller when we’ve all spilled soda or water on one and watched it become useless and they’re taking this into… the ocean… and just to add insult to injury, playing on offbrand controllers always irritated me so to see them cut even further was super strange.
more than anything it is that combined with the stuff he bragged about buying from camper world—just a sign of strange corner cutting indicating their was likely more that we weren’t seeing.
> it’s strange on its face to use a game controller when we’ve all spilled soda or water on one and watched it become useless and they’re taking this into… the ocean… and just to add insult to injury,
I mean the buttons got sticky but that's the worst I saw, nothing a bit of IPA wouldn't fix.
But yeah, definitely red flag, especially that they used wireless one. Industrial (and so protected from dust and at least humidity) ones are not that expensive compared to the price of massive carbon tube at least
> playing on offbrand controllers always irritated me so to see them cut even further was super strange.
Lmao "offbrand" Logitech is one of biggest makes of accessories. They have both good and cheap stuff, this one is some midrange one so I doubt quality is a problem.
Also it's a PC controller, what "brand" would they be offing ?
Even wireless doesn't seem that much of an issue. There isn't going to be any external interference down there, so as long as they've tested all the systems it should be OK. Also it's not going to be dusty, and it's not humid (if anything the humidity is going to be very low as the water outside is cold, any moisture in the air will condense on the hull)
Ah, maybe. I see it differently though. reddit has never been about authentic content.
- When they started, I believe they boasted creating fake accounts to mimic engagement to help grow community
- It is painfully obvious the amount of political, gov sponsored, and corporate astro turfing that “gets through”. Both human and bot comment farms are real and have no doubt been artificially bolstering ideas and content for years
As I see it…
They have enabled this / looked the other away at this behavior forever in exchange for engagement. The super high tech AI chat bots are probably going to be welcomed for their clever content (hence why CEO could care less about its users anymore).
Their real value has always been having a controlling voice and being able to push viral ideas. The data thing is all hype noise IMO. It was never going to be a serious part of their IPO. Big messy gross company.
There is a decent amount of good stuff on reddit. With a RLHF model trained on shitposting, political grandstanding, porn etc and use that to filter out, you are left with great stuff. r/experienceddevs. I would fine tune on that filtering out negative voted comments and you have a career advisor. Mods did the data cleaning already!
