This entire industry is built on exploiting both workers and consumers. If you think you have a say, you do not, unless your say does not impact the business model. The TOS is designed to be a middle finger to your face.
How is this news when we all know git is decentralized? News at 11: company enforces their own TOS. Github is about as useful as a brand of kleenexes. If y'all didn't want this you wouldn't have used your damn pull request software to host your code.
It maters since decentralization is not a silver bullet. There is always some main repo, and it is hard to change it, or even just inform people about change. If you want other people to participate in your project then hosting it on biggest/most popular service reduces entry barrier
I mean if they were talking about "solved" I'd assume they'd just use a decision tree rather than refer to AI at all, so given the rest of the comment I assumed they were talking about beating humans 100% of the time rather than beating an arbitrary agent 100% of the time (or I guess 50% if you can't pick which color).
Isn't this just an echo of computationally? Why involve the distraction of intelligence at all when what you're discussing is a computable algorithm with known bounds? Is there anything special about intelligence—Penrose's bullshit[0] aside—that can't be computed? If not is it anything other than a marketing term for computation that seems more "advanced" to humans?
Yes, intelligence is the ability for a small finite system to deal with infinity of possibilities in a successful way.
No matter how big computationally the AI is, the test was always trying to deal with something new, outside its comfort zone. Preferably as far outside it as possible.
To do that successfully requires general problem solving and abstraction skills.
Of course one can do better or worse at that, including humans.
You cannot precompute most of the answer to a truly open question.
